Select the best for Army Chief
Zeenews
       English        
Thursday, May 17, 2012 
Search
Follwo us on: Facebook Follwo us on: Twiter RSS Mail to us Mail to us Mail to us
Blogs

Select the best for Army Chief

Wednesday, February 15, 2012, 16:23 Views 1091 Comments 19
Commentary
a
Wise Generals don’t fight avoidable wars. The Chief of Army Staff, General V K Singh, fought a prolonged war on a personal issue, stretched his lines beyond a limit and lost it.

As a serving Chief of one of the largest armies of the world he ought not to have become a complainant before the highest court of the land – only to lose the war he had waged for several months over the date of his birth.

Was he born in 1950 or in 1951 was the question. Involved was a few months’ extension of his tenure in the top most job in the Indian Army.

The Indian Army has a high reputation to keep and it was the duty of General V K Singh to protect it. By approaching the Supreme Court he staked his own honour and that of the post he was holding. Both have come out somewhat bruised.

Why he made a simple question of his own date of birth a matter of honour cannot be easily explained. Had the system of army promotion done injustice to him, or was it some pent up grievance he was nursing all along that had pushed him on to a wrong track which was bound to lead him to a dead-end.

Going by the obiter dicta of the two judges it was clear that Gen. V K Singh was overdrawing on his honour theme that he felt would be compromised if he was to be considered born in 1950.

The judges rejected his demand that he be considered born in 1951, but gave avuncular advice to the chief that he is “a great soldier” and that a date of birth did not have a bearing on his honour.

Having reached the acme of his career with the Indian armed forces, the court seemed to be asking: “What more do you want, General?”

The judges did not want to go into the question that V K Singh was born in 1951. They chose to go by May 10, 1950 as the date of birth as shown in the application form filled in by the young aspirant himself when he sat for the NDA examination, and also by the records of the UPSC.

The Supreme Court also saw merit in the Ministry of Defence going by the undertaking given by the General himself in 2008 and 2009 that he would go by the 1950 date. This was when he was being promoted to higher ranks on the ladder that led to his being the Chief of Army Staff.

Justice H L Gokhale said in the court: “The government gave you an opportunity. It is not fair to criticize the Defence Ministry. The matter was treated as closed. The government made you Chief of the Army. They could have easily said ‘We don’t need such a person’.”

Justice R M Lodha said: “We want to ensure as Chief of Army you continue to serve the country as you did in 38 years. This verdict should not come in your way. Wise men are those who move with the wind.”

As good old uncles often do, this was an exercise in applying balm to a General who has lost his battle, and who might take defeat to heart and quit his job.

Men who have a heightened sense of honour often need such a piece of advice and it is good the Supreme Court gave it to the General. The Chief himself in his long career himself might have given this kind of advice to a junior with a hurt ego.

Whether General V K Singh chooses to accept the Supreme Court’s advice remains to be seen. On the surface, his continuance at the helm seems to have become untenable. This is because he took the battle too far, leaving himself with little space to beat retreat with a grace.

It is for him to decide. In service, he would become a kind of lame duck in uniform; always looking back over on his 38 years of the battles, won and lost, including the great DoB battle.

General V K Singh should feel happy he made it to the top. He must, however, ponder whether it was worth all the bother. He might also consider whether it is wise to divide his Army in two camps – for and against him on his personal issue.

Or did he get carried away with the breaking news headlines in the newspapers or on the TV channels? For weeks the General’s age had become their staple.

The government has clearly won the case in the Supreme Court. But it must review the system of selecting the Chief of Army Staff. Particularly it should consider whether the seniority principle which guides the selection process gets the best of chiefs for the Army.

Often the senior-most General may not be the option. Indian Army requires the ablest of the commanders to be its chief. The accident of getting born on a particular day should not be decisive.

The best way perhaps would be to select the best General out of top brass of eight top commanders.

(Mr H K Dua is a senior journalist and Member of Parliament.)
(The views expressed by the author are personal)
SUMIT RAHUL ISAAC - MIHIJAM, JHARKHAND
the constitution of india has bestowed every indian (irrespective of whether he occupies an official government post or not)the right to get his or her grievances redressed through judicial system, and if that person exercises that right to get his genuine grievances redressed the matured & discerning citizen of this land, shouldn`t raise a hue & cry about a top army post getting denigrated or its sanctity being waned.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
y s krishnamoorthy - maharashtra
i agree - the best for the army - but why not also say - elect the best for the parliament and government???
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
N.K.Vaidya - Houston, Tx., USA
i agree entirely with the comments of shri. h.k.dua.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
dharamsingh - bahadurgarh
one thingh is still in disguise as when the general himself filled in his dob as 1950 on several times and got benefits then what thing made him to claim and sue for 1951.this was the ground on which he lost his case in the apex court.he is holding the highest rank in the cadre
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
sanjay anand - dubai
among the first things that every gentleman cadet who joins the national defence academy (nda) at khadakwasla is asked to do is to write a brief autobiography. when vijay kumar singh reported to the nda on 13 july 1966 to begin his training, he wrote in his autobiography, “i was born on 10th may 1951 in poona. my father is an army officer. i have two younger brothers and a younger sister. i first went to st columbus high school and did my first class from there. then i joined the birla public school, pilani.”
Reply

Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
manchala ranjit kumar reddy - nandyal.kurnool(dist).ap.pin;518501
vear good job
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
vijay - new delhi
regret typing error. please read 10 may 1951 for 12 may 1951 in my comments.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Vijay - New Delhi
mr dua,generals do not decide to fight an avoidable war. it is the mps and politicians who decide so. the generals know only to fight war decisively and win it for their country. the general had a material issue which concerned him personally, to be decided by the apex court as the organization and the government failed to resolve the same throughout his army tenure. it was not a war but a battle of principles. the general has won this battle of principals also as he shall be using 12 may 1951 as his actual date of birth through the rest of his life in all government records except those of army. the government has in fact lost the battle as the apex court has declined to rule that 12 may 1950 shall be reckoned as his actual date of birth other than the army records. he has gone to the apex court not as the army chief but as a law-abiding citizen of this country. i salute him for his disciplined move. to believe that the chief had gone to the apex court for extension of his tenure is misnomer. the chief has up kept the high traditions & reputation of this proud army and the same has been acknowledged by this great nation. i am proud of the integrity and valor of this great soldier of our motherland. the hon’ble supreme court should keep in mind as to how obiter dicta can be misinterpreted by even seasoned journalists. there is no merit in undertakings given by the general as the same were obtained beyond reasonable doubts through coercions and threats by the government. it is a very bad and sad precedent set by the government for all time to come and shall remain as a blot on democracy. the hon’ble apex court has commended the services of this great soldier and so should we do -mr. dua. the chief has welcomed the judgment of the apex court. may god give wisdom to all to interpret the issues in right perspective.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
BRIJ - NEWYORK
the word is the best,in answer who will the best has to be best.god knows which way we are heading,i can only pray for good.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
k lall - goa
Here is a case where a person has been commissioned as an army officer and retiring without verification of date of his birth. who are responsible to verify and rectify the mistakes in the documents? you cannot think about the predicaments of a soldier. how much has the government humiliated the chief by coercing him to admit 10 may 1950 as his date of birth otherwise he shall not be promoted. the hon’ble supreme court has also passed uncalled for comments on the preposition of the date of birth. the only relief or justice the chief was praying before the hon’ble apex court was that please confirm 10 may 1951 as my actual date of his birth. how one can carry two dates of births even after retirement from the service and what would be its complications through the rest of his life. only the wearer knows where the shoe pinches! the hon’ble apex court has given partial relief to the beleaguered general that 10 may 1950 shall be his date of birth reckoned for military service only. indirectly the apex court has also acknowledged 10 may 1951 the actual date of birth of the general. the correct preposition before the apex court should have been to rule that they acknowledge 10 may 1951 as the actual date of birth of the general for military service record also, however the general shall retire on 31 may 2012 as per his various undertakings given to the government although obtained through threats and coercion. if you humiliate a soldier that too the chief of the army staff in this manner than no body would like to join the armed forces.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Balbir Singh - Chandigarh
the union government is equally to be blamed for this avoidable episode as it did not handle it properly. and the issue went to the tie-breaker session to resolve the dispute. who is the winner and who is the loser ?. the govt emerged the winner and the system the loser. however, the general should have not knocked the door of the supreme court (in fact any court). the army officers are known for their supreme sacrifices. general sahib you have lost the case but not the respect an any army officer receives from an indian. i salute the army. jai hind
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Major Prakash Patil - Jaysingpur
very well summed up, balbir singh.
Reply

Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
George K John - Kuwait
if an officer is highly efficient and honest towards his possition as well as his country, then his age bar must not be considered as a big issue.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Major Prakash Patil (Retd) - Jaysingpur
mr dua, you are too harsh in your thoughts and words. had the general won the case, probably, your article would have been full of kudos for the fighting spirit shown by gen v k singh, true to a soldier. in marathi we say, `` there are many claimants for the victory but the defeat is always orphan``. you have made the promotion of gen v k singh to the top post to look as an alms given to him. you have quoted from the judgement, ``the govt gave you opportunity``.on the contrary, the country needed a good general to command its forces and ``lt gen`v k singh was chosen because he eminently suited for the post. you talk about his own honour and that of the army got bruised in this episode. what about the govt, the defence minister and babus? did they acquit themselves with glory and honour? general had unequivocally agreed to retire in may 2012, and later in the court he had stated that he was ready to quit the post within 48 hours, if his plea for dob was accepted. are we still going to attribute him of greed for one more year of service? you have read too much unwanted meaning in the words of praise expressed by the judges and ridiculed them as some sort of a sugar coarting. i don`t think so, the court had genuinely appreciated the unblemished service of almost four decades, rendered with distinction, by general v k singh.you have overlooked few vital facts. firstly, had the general not signed the undertaking to accept 1950 as dob, he would have just gone to play golf as a retired major general. secondly, was extracting an undertaking in lieu of a promotion, a fair, impartial and established method? thirdly, who and why opened the lid from this can of conflicting dobs? who was that retired ias officer and at whose behest he did it? fourthly, didn`t the problem went out of control because media played it to the hilt? and lastly, as a senior journalist and an mp, what role did you play to find the honorable solution, before it went in a public domain? mr. dua, your article is too lopsided and unfair to a great soldier. we had expected a far more balanced article written with sensitivity, from a respected journalist of your stature.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
George Soney - chennai
i think all are missing the main point. that mod would not like to amend their records even if its wrong ! when they came to know of 2 date of births they should have found out which is the correct date and not say that your date of birth is 1950 and not 1951 , else you would not be considered for corp commander job !!
probably it would be the first time in the world that date of birth is considered as a criteria for promotion, even in schools they don`t indulge in that sort of system.
if mod`s attitude is like this, just imagine all other issues which army /navy/ airforce hqs puts up- its basically ego. date of birth can only be one. i feel even the judge has erred in this
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
ANIL BAKSHI - Mumbai
best amongst 8 : how and who will decide this as once al 8 have reached that position after approx 36 years surviving huge attrition : how do you say one is better than the other : how will antony decide that ?, & the premature death of 7 three star generals & its coast to army & the nation ?

will the same meritocracy be also applied to ion of foreign secretary and other secretaries or these babu “babes” will be safe per seniority inter se ?
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
murali - Bangalore
marshal.romel is an example who was nick named boy marshall by other senior generals of the german army during world war 2
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
nikhil - dubai
for the general v.k singh it was his own contention that while joining the army he himself wrote his d.o.b. and that always should stand valid.

a similar example is of kiran bedi who inspite of her seniority was not promoted as commissioner of delhi police, and that led he to resign. gen singh should also have resigned to stick to his gun, but the bullet in his gun was made in 1950. sure he is not a scrap dealer to manipulate his d.o.b. as required at a particular time. he should have been happier with his decorations. !!! after all individual person vs establishment hardly keeps any room for persons to win. the issue was carried out since day one of his joining nda !!!
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
dharamsingh - bahadurgarh
the case of kiran bedi is different from of gen. singh. gen. has already got promotion to the highest rank and an undisputed fellow.the problem was only due his two dob. where as kiran was not a role model for obvious reason.her performance was not considered good when posted as incharge of Tihad jail and in far east.she was waiting promotion
Reply

Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Post your Comments

Name  
Place :  
Email :  
Comments :