Pap = Political Commentary
Zeenews
       English        
 Follow Me on Pinterest Google Plus Ditto RSS Mail to us Mail to us
Thursday, May 23, 2013 
Search
Blogs

Pap = Political Commentary

Last Updated: Wednesday, May 18, 2011, 13:41
Views 322 Comments 2  
Contrarian
a
The Indian political commentator is a curious creature. Taking warm oozy comfort in platitudes that fit like snug blankets even when it is 45 degrees outside.

Sample some standard platitudes that fall like mulch manure – No. 1, the voter is all wise. Really! Replacing corrupt, to the gills and nepotistic M Karunanidhi with Jayalalithaa with her rather enduring record of corruption is sagacity on the voter's part or plain desperation at the lack of choice?

And, after nearly four decades in West-Bengal - government fatigue and voter disenchantment are not state secrets to which our babes in the wood commentators are not privy to. And, while celebrating the demise of the Left with riotous joy why are they yet to ponder the track-record and lack of coherent ideology of Mamata Banerjee, who is supposed to transform all of West Bengal into a Garden of Eden. Incidentally, an international test in the Eden gardens would also be an achievement worth punting for.
/>
Our dear political commentators, who would not be caught dead near the common or garden voter, need to stop this kind of patronizing drivel about politicians who are in throes of glee that such analysis would actually perform.

Pundit truism number two is about attacking and reviling the middle class (people like us biting in to people like us) who do not vote hate universal enfranchisement and want revolution via SMS.

Reading this particular piece of drivel irritates me to irrational levels since unlike the limousine liberal class, I do actually, like lakhs of middle class people, queue up for hours to vote.

Attacking Anna Hazare. It is sad that thousands of trees have perished for newsprint as our commentariat suffused with rage at the great challenge that Anna, if they are to be believed, represents to democracy as we know it. Hence the plants, the nudge nudge wink wink comments.

And, finally they cannot even see the paradox in the re-election of Tarun Gogoi or Nitish Kumar. Voters like to see what they are voting for. A nebulous dream leader picked by and servile to the Gandhi dynasty will not work in Uttar Pradesh despite all the hard work done by Rahul Gandhi.

With elections less than a year away, have our dear commentators who have been working themselves up in apoplectic fits over Anna bothered to analyze who is the leader that the Congress will project against Mayawati or are the voters just supposed to stamp the good intentions of Rahul Gandhi.

Jagganmohan anyone?
(The views expressed by the author are personal)
Sanjeev Kumar - London
i agree with swatiji`s comments on the second rate commentry in india. vested interests are out to get at honest critics like anna and are only able to over simplyfy complex issues. well said swati ji !
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
PRADIP K MAJUMDAR - VARANASI
poor voters get pained to see media men devoting so much time and money in covering and hovering so called vips and dynastic pins. at times people have no or less choice. sometimes government`s own fatigue in fooling the people consistently and unholy governance bring frustration to the machinery and voters giving way to change. we see such frustrations fathoming in wb and tn.

i agree with your observations on the tracking of track-history of incoherent ideologies in these states. and voters wants to see where their precious votes go.

it is high time we check our democratic system that must be devoid of dynasty dependency and nepotism. voters must learn to ignore the prerogatives enjoyed by so called popular but poorly meritorious kings and maharajas of indian democracy.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Post your Comments

Name  
Place :  
Email :  
Comments :