Science and Religion!!!
Zeenews
       English        
 Follow Me on Pinterest Google Plus Ditto RSS Mail to us Mail to us
Wednesday, June 19, 2013 
Search
Blogs

Science and Religion!!!

Last Updated: Thursday, August 09, 2012, 20:45
Views 1910 Comments 28  
Solitary Reaper
a
Recently, when scientists at the CERN research centre near Geneva, Switzerland, claimed to have spotted a sub-atomic particle “consistent” with the ‘Higgs Boson’* aka ‘God particle’, the first thought that struck me was – ‘will science ever eliminate our religion in future’?

Having said that, I do not mean that I am anti-science; on the contrary, I love science and I genuinely salute all science geniuses for their selfless service in exploring new things behind the scenes. But the comparison of the ‘Higgs boson’ to God has disheartened me as it can create a colossal puzzle in the human mind, especially the laymen.

As I contemplate about the Higgs boson being referred to as ‘God Particle’, I wonder how and why this ‘perplexing particle’ has been so designated. Though science has been outstandingly luminous and has unraveled innumerable mystifying miracles, I felt it’s simply unfair to compare God with our worldly wisdom.

To me, comparing God wi
th human’s insight is nothing but a futile and foolish act. The mortal being can simply investigate God’s creation and be awed by it because HE is beyond description and the source of all creation.

Even Peter Higgs, the man behind the ‘Higgs boson’, and who himself is an atheist, expressed his displeasure about the particle being nicknamed as the “God particle”, as he believes the term “might offend people who are religious”.

Not just him, but the scientific community too strongly disliked the epithet and regarded it as inappropriate sensationalism since the particle has nothing to do with God, nor has any mystical associations.

It is believed that this nickname for the ‘Higgs boson’ is attributed to US Nobel prize winner Leon Lederman, the author of the book – ‘The God Particle: If the Universe is the Answer, What is the Question?’ But it is said that Lederman actually wanted to name the particle as “goddamn particle” to reflect the failure to find it, but his editor wouldn’t let him do so.

No doubt, the scientific theories about the origin of the universe always contradict the religious teachings. While the biblical account of the creation of the universe can be found in the book of Genesis, science has different versions on it.

But, I believe religion and science can also network synergistically and generate new, interesting ideas when co-coordinated wisely.

However, media on the other hand, with its impact on the society today, should be cautious enough when branding a term - be it a scientific research or any kind of innovative work, because giving a wrong appellation can mislead people thereby creating huge bafflement and confusion in the minds of the people.

I wish the ‘Higgs boson’ particle had not been dubbed as ‘God Particle’, although its discovery is a new chapter in particle physics.

*(Higgs boson- is a never-before-seen subatomic particle long thought to be a fundamental building block of the universe. Scientists believe that the Higgs boson is the particle that gives all matter its mass.)
(The views expressed by the author are personal)
Dr Thej - New Delhi
nice article
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Rational - Delhi
the article reads like a sermon for believers for the following reasons:

1- whatever is “beyond description” is not a description, but an oxymoron! she gives no evidence of ``god is beyond description``?

2- if god is beyond description then god does not exist!

3- if you claim you don’t know what god is, you cannot claim he exists!

4- ``beyond description`` is claiming what you ignore is knowledge!

goddamn particle was changed to god particle by media.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
R Brown - Maryland, USA
did god create man or did man create god? there are people who never heard or worshipped your imaginary friend and they are so-existing much better than the faithful and absence of crime, disease and pestilence. ?????
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Anil - Bangalore
its merely a term hyped by the media. i don`t think it deserves the attention you give it. also, i don`t think the the author of this blog is clear about her definition of `god`. it makes little sense to say, `that which cannot be described is god`. i am sorry to say, but this ambiguity in the definition makes this human race blind and stupid and senseless. it used to be really hard to define the dynamics of molecules at one point of time, that does not mean the dynamics qualifies as god. incomprehensibility is not god. please think clearly and independently before you can arrive to conclusions.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Jigyasu Das - Benguluru
the higgs boson adds mass only when three quark particles get together. just two are not found to form a stable proton with mass. immediately after its function of adding the mass, higgs boson ceases to exist. this concept of the need for the basic three to create matter, has been discussed in indian knowledge system which describes the universe as being created from trigunathmikaprakrithi. prakrithi is the nature of the creation of this universe and triguna are the three characteristics which help in this creation process. the process itself is called trivrtitkaranam, “the act of the three when they come together.”
amazing parallels between the ancient indian knowledge systems and modern research on creation. more here- http://wp.me/p2y0zv-7r
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Sunil - Bangalore
anil, don`t you think there are people a lot smarter than you who have asked far more difficult questions than the water to wine?

let me give you an example - the raising of lazarus from the dead. this belief is an insult to all our intelligence, precisely because our intelligence is nothing. yet this event is undeniable by the most vocal opponents of christianity (judaism).
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
leon - Malaysia
the description `god particle` is ridiculous as life cannot be made from non-life. it is hard to fathom why some scientists think otherwise. searching or finding the particle - will bring them be no closer to finding god the creator of all `particles` including scientists.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
M.ABDUL JABBAR - LAKSHADWEEP
denying the very existance of god is a himalayan blunder. whether those fools who deny the existance of god could experience or see their soul. whether those fools who deny the existance of god could see the oxygen they used for breathing and other elements with whcih they have neen made of. scientists are not 100% sure about the non-existance or existance of god. that is the basic theory of science. there are several examples to site pertaining to the mistakes of science. a scientific declaration made 10 years before is corrected now. but look to holy qur`aan. what has been revealed to prophet mohammed (p.b.u.h) centuries back is remaining as same without any change. that is what is islam. now, labelling terrorism on islam is a fashion propogated by western interests. how many innocent children, women and men killed in iraq on the false news of nuclear weapons. then do they have found anything from iraq. the same drama is repeating in afganisthan and in iran. but one day every one living in this world will realize the truth and islam. so believe in god.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
kishan sahay - bikaner
god is only imagination. he never told about his existece,it is the man who have put up different imagination about god. universe is being run by scientific rules. all the natural incidents are happening according to cause-effect theory.there is no doer such as god, of these incidents.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Anand - Hyderabad
the title of this article is so misleading.

the term god particle ,as the author helself accedes, was not coined by a scientist but rather by the editors of a book. it was just a name that stuck. she uses this as a premise for her argument, and concludes that incidences such as this is the reason for the growing devide between science and religion.

she writes and i quote
``no doubt, the scientific theories about the origin of the universe always contradict the religious teachings. while the biblical account of the creation of the universe can be found in the book of genesis, science has different versions on it.``

the age of earth according to the bible is no more than 5000 years, whereas in reality it is older than 4 billion years. so these are not just different versions, but the later is a correction of the former.

it would make more sense if we concede to the fact that all religions were nothing but our first attempt at science, medicine, philosiphy and morality!
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Jhon - Gaya
science will never harm and eliminate religion , and humanity . but the most horrible threat is the islamic extremism that is destroying all over the world ,the edifice of the free society , rational justice , liberal view , compassion , peace and humanity .
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
BRIJ - NEWYORK
so called higgs particle or god,s particle is not a topic for common people, even they are reasonable educated,unless being explained in classes in easy explanations,which is not easy in million gods country like india.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Abhi - Delhi
the particle wasn`t called `god particle` signifying its designation as god. in the initial phases of higgs boson theory, inspite of grueling search it couldn`t be traced, leading one of the fellow physicists to name is `god-damn particle`, which the media eventually dubbed, for its convenience as god particle. it no where refers as a supernatural thing. plain physics. thats it.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Post your Comments

Name  
Place :  
Email :  
Comments :