Washington: The US pharma industry has expressed concern over deteriorating intellectual property environment in India, alleging that patent rights in the country are unreasonably denied.
"PhRMA remains concerned about the deteriorating intellectual property environment in India," Mark Grayson, PhRMA spokesman said.
The remarks by PhRMA or Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, representing America's leading biopharmaceutical researchers and biotechnology companies, comes days after the India's Ambassador to the US, Nirupama Rao, wrote to US lawmakers and a Congressional committee held a hearing on the issue.
"We have shared our views about the importance of promoting a policy environment that supports continued research and development of new medicines with Ambassador Rao and other members of the Indian Government," Grayson said.
In a letter to US lawmakers last month, Rao had defended India's IP policy arguing that India has a well-settled, stable and robust intellectual property regime.
"The three main pillars of this regime are comprehensive laws, detailed rules to back them up, and strong enforcement mechanisms, including for dispute resolution," she had said.
Rao had said of all patents granted for pharmaceutical inventions between 2005 and 2011, more than 85 percent were owned by foreign companies in India, with US holding 20-30 percent share of the patents.
Noting that the provisions of the Compulsory License enshrined in the India Patent Act are in accordance with the provisions of the TRIPs Agreement and the Paris Convention, she had said that through such licensing mechanisms, all governments balance the rights of the patent holder.
"Since its inception, Compulsory Licensing has been an integral part of the patent regime of different countries. Globally, 15 different countries, developed and developing alike, have issued more than 35 compulsory licenses. India has issued only one Compulsory License," Rao said.
However, Rao's letter has failed to convince the US pharma industry who continues to push the Obama Administration on India's policies related to the intellectual property regime.
"India's protectionist and discriminatory policies which exploit U S IP to benefit their own industry requires an equally bold response.
It is important that we view these actions for what they are, industrialist policies to benefit the competitiveness of India's own domestic industry," Roy Waldron, Chief Intellectual Property Officer with Pfizer, told lawmakers last week.
"India's actions to undermine the incentives needed to make investment to develop new medicines, a hostile environment to IP will have a devastating impact on R&D investment in both the US and India and cause significant harm for US jobs and economic growth," he said.
First Published: Tuesday, July 2, 2013, 08:50