Cyrus Mistry's fate hangs in balance as shareholders of TCS vote today

A day after he was removed as the director and chairman of Tata Industries, Cyrus Mistry's fate hangs in balance as shareholders of Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) will go to vote on Tuesday to remove him as the company's director.

Updated: Dec 13, 2016, 12:48 PM IST
PlayCyrus Mistry's fate hangs in balance as shareholders of TCS vote today

New Delhi: A day after he was removed as the director and chairman of Tata Industries, Cyrus Mistry's fate hangs in balance as shareholders of Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) will go to vote on Tuesday to remove him as the company's director.

Cyrus Mistry was on Monday removed as the director and chairman of Tata Industries at shareholders' meet. By virtue of his removal as the director, he also ceased to be the chairman of the company too.

The TCS shareholders' vote on Tuesday will also be a crucial test for Ratan Tata, the Chairman Emiretus and interim boss of Tata Sons and Cyrus Mistry as this will be first such instance of the embattled executive being ousted from the board since his removal as Tata Group chairman in October.

On October 24, in a move that took the corporate world by shock, Misty was removed as the chairman of Tata Sons and Ratan Tata appointed as interim boss for four months.

On November 17, TCS board decided to call Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) "pursuant to the Special Notice & Requisition dated November 9, 2016 sent by Tata Sons, shareholder of the company holding 73.26 per cent of the paid-up equity share capital of the company".

Tata Sons seeks to pass a shareholder resolution for removal of Mistry as director after removing him as Chairman on November 10, replacing him with Ishaat Hussain.

It had made use of one of the statutes that makes it possible to nominate the chairman of the board, while replacing Mistry with group veteran Hussain.

The Mistry camp had lashed out at his removal as Chairman of TCS calling it as a reflection of "cloak and dagger" machinations that define "the angry strategy of the Ratan Tata camp".

He had even alleged that Tata once tried to sell the IT firm to IBM and his "ego" led to bad business decisions like Corus acquisition at double the original cost. However, he changed his stance later stating his statement was based on "information from sources who were close to JRD Tata who informed him that it was Ratan Tata's intention, and not the group's intention, to sell TCS".

Tomorrow's voting by TCS shareholders will be the first of six such EGMs called by major listed firms -- Indian Hotels Co Ltd (December 20), Tata Steel (December 21), Tata Motors (December 22), Tata Chemicals (December 23) and Tata Power (December 26) -- to seek Mistry's ouster as director.

In case of Tata Motors, Tata Steel and Tata Chemicals, the shareholders will also be voting for a resolution moved by Tata Sons to remove Nusli Wadia as independent director.

Tata Sons has been stepping up the pressure on Mistry ever since he was sacked as Chairman of the company on October 24. It had made several allegations against Mistry, including betraying trust and trying to gain control of major operating firms, concentrating powers and using free-hand given to him to weaken management structures of the Tata Group.

Last week, in a letter to shareholders of the companies, Tata stated that the continued presence of Mistry in their respective boards was a serious "disruptive influence" and could make the companies "dysfunctional".

Market observers said the voting pattern of the non-

promoter group will give an indication of the level of support Mistry enjoys from shareholders in general, which in turn could set the tone for other such EGMs that are to follow.

Mistry has vehemently denied all the allegations and stated that he was pushed to the position of a "lame duck chairman" and changes in the decision making process created "alternate power centres" in Tata Group.

In a dig at Tata, he also alleged that individuals prone to "impulsive control" have exposed the Tata Group to perilous violation of regulatory requirements and his fight was to protect the conglomerate from "capricious" decision-making by Interim Chairman Ratan Tata.

 

With PTI Inputs