Judge dismisses Beckham`s libel suit against magazine
A judge on Monday dismissed David Beckham`s $25 million libel lawsuit against a celebrity magazine that ran an article saying the married, British soccer star slept with a call girl.
|Last Updated: Feb 15, 2011, 09:43 AM IST|Source: Bureau
Los Angeles: A judge on Monday dismissed David Beckham`s $25 million libel lawsuit against a celebrity magazine that ran an article saying the married, British soccer star slept with a call girl.U.S. District Judge Manuel Real said Beckham, whose wife Victoria was a member of the Spice Girls singing group, is a public figure and claims of adultery against him are of interest to the public.
Real also said there was no evidence In Touch Weekly magazine exhibited malice when it published the story about the L.A. Galaxy player, which is key because under U.S. law, evidence of malice is an important benchmark for winning a libel lawsuit.
Beckham has declared in court papers that he never met Irma Nici, the $10,000 per-night New York call girl originally from Europe, who was quoted in the story saying she slept with him in New York and London.
Attorneys for Beckham said they will appeal Real`s decision and continue their fight against U.S.-based In Touch and its owner, Bauer Publishing Company.
"They have not provided one shred of evidence to support the claim this story is true," a spokesman for Beckham`s attorneys said in a statement. "David Beckham`s clear evidence proved that this is without foundation."
"Unfortunately, the U.S. legal system requires us to show that the magazine acted maliciously," the statement said.
Beckham said in court papers that in September 2007 when, according to the In Touch article he met Nici for sex in London, he was never with her but was attending to his sick father who had suffered a heart attack.
An In Touch editor declared in court papers that Nici claimed during an interview that Beckham seemed downcast when she met him in London, because his father was sick.
In Touch sought to corroborate Nici`s story of an affair with Beckham by speaking to other people apart from Nici, such as her madam, the company said in court papers.
But In Touch did not ask the judge to rule on the truth or falsity of the article, said its attorney, Elizabeth McNamara. Instead, it sought to have the lawsuit dismissed on the grounds that the magazine did not act maliciously.
"We`re very pleased with this decision, we think the court correctly applied the law in dismissing the action against the publisher," McNamara said.
An appeal by Beckham`s attorneys would go to the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.
In their $25 million libel lawsuit filed last fall, Beckham`s attorneys also named Nici as a defendant.
Beckham, 35, and Victoria have been married for 11 years. They have three children and are awaiting the birth of their fourth child later this year.
Bureau Report
By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.
Cookies Setting
By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device and the processing of information obtained via those cookies (including about your preferences, device and online activity) by us and our commercial partners to enhance site navigation, personalise ads, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. More information can be found in our Cookies and Privacy Policy. You can amend your cookie settings to reject non-essential cookies by clicking Cookie Settings below.
Manage Consent Preferences
Strictly Necessary Cookies
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work or you may not be able to login.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then some or all of these services may not function properly.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They are also used to limit the number of times you see an advert as well as help measure the effectiveness of an advertising campaign. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we may not know when you have visited our site, and may not be able to monitor its performance.