Burberry sued for using Bogart’s ‘Casablanca’ image on Facebook timeline
Last Updated: Saturday, May 05, 2012, 18:32
  

New York: The estate of Humphrey Bogart has sued British-based clothes company ‘Burberry’ over the use of the Hollywood icon’s name in what it alleges was an advertising campaign. But Burberry has filed a counter suit, insisting it did not breach Bogart’s rights by using a photo of Bogart wearing one of the brand’s trench coats in the movie “Casablanca,” and is even seeking damages from the actor’s estate.

Both companies filed their legal action in the United States on Wednesday, a couple of weeks after the estate raised the issue with the classic English clothing company. The Bogart Estate filed its action in Los Angeles, saying Burberry used the trench coat picture from the final scene of Oscar-winning 1942 classic ‘Casablanca’, on Twitter and Facebook, without seeking its permission.

“Just as Burberry needed to obtain (Harry Potter actress) Emma Watson’s consent before using her name and image to promote Burberry’s brand and products, it needed to obtain permission from the Bogart Estate to use Humphrey Bogart’s name,” a leading daily has quoted lawyer Michael O. Crain as saying.

“Burberry’s business hinges on respect for its own intellectual property rights, so it is quite surprising to see that it apparently has so little respect for the clear rights of others,” Crain said.

But Burberry counter-sued in New York, saying the photo was licensed from photo agency Corbis for editorial use. It said Burberry first contacted it about the issue on April 10. Burberry said the image was used in the context of a historic “timeline” of the British company, used on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram, showing the development of its “culture, products and people” over the decades.

“Burberry’s use of this photo and description were intended to reflect on the long history, significance and influence of Burberry fashion in society,” said the Burberry lawsuit.

“Burberry’s use of the image... was not directly connected to the sale of any merchandise, but rather was a historical positioning of the image within an educational project along with numerous other photographs...” the law suit read.

Stephen Bogart, son of the Hollywood legend, was not convinced, saying: “This is such an incredibly disappointing and disrespectful action by Burberry. Apparently they believe a shoe company can advertise the fact that Brad Pitt wore its brand while jogging down the street, or a beverage company can claim George Clooney drank its product in one of his movies -- all without even asking, much less obtaining, the actors’ permission. Wouldn’t that be a nice, clever way to get Hollywood icons to endorse or advertise products without paying compensation or, more importantly, obtaining permission?

“What’s next, a cigarette company can start an advertising program claiming Bogie smoked its brand, and there’s nothing our family can do about it?” he added.

ANI


First Published: Saturday, May 05, 2012, 18:32



comments powered by Disqus