Advertisement

Climate change or us? Humans at fault for bulk of Arctic sea ice loss!

Understanding all causes of the sea ice retreat is crucial for accurately projecting the rate of future loss, and trying to slow it.

Climate change or us? Humans at fault for bulk of Arctic sea ice loss! (Image for representational purposes only)

New Delhi: Massive changes in global ecology taking place on a daily basis bear testimony to the haunting impact of the ever-changing climate.

This ecological impact has given rise to a rapid increase in burning of fossil fuels, emission of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, large-scale deforestation, loss of biodiversity, severe land degradation and environmental pollution.

Climate change and global warming are gradually wreaking havoc over the planet and unfortunately, there are many among the world's population who still feign ignorance at this morbid facet of truth, especially those who feel that climate change is not a result of human activities.

With the frigid Arctic region losing sea ice at a fast pace, scientists are concerned about its impact on the world.

After warning that nature is 170 times behind humans in the race to cause climate change, scientists have once again said that natural changes in the environment are responsible for about 40 percent of Arctic sea ice loss, while humans are to blame for the rest.

The climate study, based on model simulations of different climate conditions, was a rare attempt to quantify the relative contributions of humans and nature to the dramatic decline and could have a major impact on future research.

Understanding all causes of the sea ice retreat is crucial for accurately projecting the rate of future loss, and trying to slow it.

Scientists have long accepted that natural changes in the environment, such as atmospheric air circulation, were at least partly responsible.

But its relative contribution, and that of human-induced global warming, has been fiercely debated.

The new study concluded that up to 60 percent of sea ice decline since 1979 was caused by summertime changes in atmospheric circulation.

About 70 percent of the air flow changes, in turn, were the result of natural variability, not human-caused climate change.

 

Taken together, this meant that between half and two-thirds the sea ice decline was attributable to climate change, said the American team.

Natural variability, on the other hand, "dominates the Arctic summer circulation trend and may be responsible for about 30-50 percent of the overall decline in September sea ice since 1979," they said.

Commentators not involved in the study said its findings do not call into question whether human-induced planet warming has contributed to Arctic sea-ice loss.

"Realising that humans have caused 50-70 percent of the decline is not good news," said Twila Moon, a lecturer in Cryospheric Sciences at the University of Bristol.

"Continuing to put carbon dioxide and other emissions into the atmosphere is having a direct negative impact on the Arctic, including sea ice," she said via the Science Media Centre in London.

Chris Rapley, a professor of climate science at University College London, said the study helped explain why Arctic sea ice was disappearing faster than most climate models predict – they underestimated the contribution of natural drivers.

Models for future predictions will have to be adapted, according to the findings published in the journal Nature Climate Change.

Last month, US government scientists said Arctic sea ice cover in January was 13.38 million square kilometres (5.17 million sq. Miles) – 1.26 million sq. km. below the 1981–2010 average.

This was the smallest January extent since records began in 1979 and 260,000 sq. km. (100,000 sq. miles) smaller than the previous low recorded in 2016.

Sea ice, floating slabs of frozen ocean water which grow in winter and melt in summer, provides an essential platform for hunters – humans and bears alike – and helps moderate the climate by reflecting the Sun's rays.

The region is warming at about twice the global average rate.

(With AFP inputs)