What Pujara needs to learn from the fastest 1000-run club?
Zeenews
       English        
 Follow Me on Pinterest Google Plus Ditto RSS Mail to us Mail to us
Sunday, May 26, 2013 
Search
ZRG

What Pujara needs to learn from the fastest 1000-run club?

Last Updated: Tuesday, March 05, 2013, 18:16
Views 11027 Comments 8  
What Pujara needs to learn from the fastest 1000-run club?   Pankaj Sharma/Zee Research Group/Delhi

Cheteshwar Pujara has now become the second Indian and the 17th player in the world to score the fastest 1000 runs in Test cricket. This would surely do his confidence immense good. But going forward, more than celebration there is a lot to learn and unlearn from the exalted company Pujara now keeps.

One, the young Gujarat batsman must not take his eye off a key stat: none of the top 20 batsmen in the world who collected quickest 1000 runs have so far scaled the 10,000 runs mark in Test cricket. Interestingly, while run-machine Sachin Tendulkar does not feature in the list of top 20 cricketers to score fastest 1000 runs in Test cricket, he sits by far and wide, on the top of the order with 15,746 Test runs to his credit. Another great Brian Lara too does not feature in the top 20 to score 1000 runs in Test cricket but has the distinction of being the only batsman in the world to score 400 runs in a Test inning.


Second, there is so much to learn and unlearn from Vinod Kambli, the only Indian to feature in the list of cricketers to score the fastest 1000 runs in Test cricket. Sure Kambli would have egged Pujara to scale the 1000 run peak but a closer look at the career stats of yesteryear’s swashbuckling cricketer holds an important lesson: Fifth on the world list of fastest to get to the 1000 run mark, in mere 14 innings, the former Indian left handed batsmen ended up playing just seven more innings in Test cricket. He scored 1084 runs in 17 Test matches he played for India.

Third, apart from his sterling record book, Tendulkar holds the mirror to the world of cricket with his amazing longevity at the crease. This is where the list of cricketers who made it fastest to the 1000 runs mark need to learn from the master: only three of the top 20 world batsmen (Graeme Smith –still playing, Andrew Strauss and Mark Taylor) in the 1000 run club ended their career playing 100 matches or more. In contrast, the little master has already played in 196 Test matches and is unwilling to hang his boots!

Fourth, there is more evidence to suggest that a crackling launch does not always ensure longevity: average number of matches played by the world’s top five batsmen who have scored fastest 1000 runs is only 50. Top on the list to score 1000 runs in tests is Herbert Sutcliffe of England who reached this milestone followed by Sir Everton Weekes of West Indies. While Sutcliffe collected 4555 runs in 54 matches played, Weekes scored 4455 runs in 48 matches.

The Australian legend Sir Don Bradman took 13 innings to achieve the milestone. But, credited with an all time best average, he aggregated only 6996 runs in his 52 outings in Test matches. Another Australian Neil Harvey took 13 test innings to touch the 1000 run mark. He scored 6149 runs in 79 matches.

First Published: 3/5/2013 6:16:30 PM

Comments

Vishal Shetty - Mumbai
robert...u r correct..longevity doesnot matter for established teams like india. its should be ``play well until u play``. its better to play few matches and play well rather than wasting too many innings. learn from south africa.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
robin - delhi
do anyone notice indian team always suffer against player whose name start from letter ,m, like malinga, mendis , murli, mcgrath, mathew hayden , micheal clarke, mike hussey, monty panesar, mclum, mark waugh, mark taylor, mahela jaywardne, mohammed hafeez, musafiqur rahim, morne morkel, mcgrath, mcgill, etc.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
robin - delhi
he is a good player but he should remain cautious from politics in indian cricket otherwise his career will be drown like narender hirwani, wassim jaffer and kambli.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Ajith - Chennai
so what are you suggesting?? dont score first 1000 runs quicker?? non-sense !!! typically sentimental. wake up.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
raghu verma - bellary (karnataka),INDIA
pujara is the best player and is right person of rahul dravid sucsessor
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
dineshpal - hathars junction
pujara is a good player in india tem
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
pratik - mumbai
he is a batsman with great temperament
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Robert - Saudi Arabia
longevity does not matter. sportsmen must not give credence to such statistics. what matters is the contribution to the team for its win. batsmen considering to remain in the team must come out with consistency, which also must be the priority. we have two batsmen in the team playing for a very long time without much contribution to the team. there are many in the wings who can be replaced for a better contribution. but, according to the author may not last long. we are a billion plus population. we can find pujaras, sachins and sewagh. dravid the wall resigned, when he realized that his wall was cracking. we found pujara. if sewagh retires, we have rahne in the bench. similarly when one talent wanes, we find one among the many. what matters is not the longevity but the contribution.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Saurabh Mhatre - mumbai
longevity is what matters at end of the day. players who have played for long have been able to do so only because they contributed to game and team. india has billion plus population but this article is about pujara so author is absolutely correct in suggesting pujara to make sure he does not become just a flash in pan and actually goes on to play for years. consistent performance is only way how he can serve team for long
Reply

Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

View all Comments   

Post your Comments

Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Most liked Comments

Robert - Saudi Arabia
longevity does not matter. sportsmen must not give credence to such statistics. what matters is the contribution to the team for its win. batsmen considering to remain in the team must come out with consistency, which also must be the priority. we have two batsmen in the team playing for a very long time without much contribution to the team. there are many in the wings who can be replaced for a better contribution. but, according to the author may not last long. we are a billion plus population. we can find pujaras, sachins and sewagh. dravid the wall resigned, when he realized that his wall was cracking. we found pujara. if sewagh retires, we have rahne in the bench. similarly when one talent wanes, we find one among the many. what matters is not the longevity but the contribution.



raghu verma - bellary (karnataka),INDIA
pujara is the best player and is right person of rahul dravid sucsessor



pratik - mumbai
he is a batsman with great temperament