New Delhi: According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), over 800,000 people die by suicide around the world each year – that’s one person every 40 seconds.
The intention of committing this lethal act stems from a disturbed mental state – risk factors like depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, personality disorders, and substance abuse, including alcoholism and use of benzodiazepines can also be responsible.
While the act is fortunately preventable, a new Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat München-study has said that media reports can have a huge impact on how readers view suicide and hence, resort to it.
As per the study, the choice of words used in media reports of suicides has a measurable impact on how readers subsequently perceive and evaluate the act of suicide.
The study was carried out by Florian Arendt together with his former colleague Sebastian Scherr and researchers based at the Medical University of Vienna.
In German, three terms are used to denote suicide – Suizid, Selbstmord ('self-murder') and Freitod ('free death').
The authors recruited 451 individuals for the web-based study. The sample was first divided into three groups. The participants read short newspaper reports on suicides, which differed from one another only in the word used to refer to the act itself (Suizid, Selbstmord or Freitod).
The texts given to members of each group used only one of these terms. Participants were then asked to summarize the content of what they had read in their own words and to fill in the blanks in a word puzzle designed to test implicit memory.
Finally, they were asked about their personal attitudes to suicide. "We found a clear effect, insofar as participants favoured the use of the term that they had previously read in the texts assigned to each of them," said Arendt.
In addition, the results provided the first indications that the three terms actually trigger different associations in readers' minds.
Participants who had read the reports that referred to Freitod expressed a more positive view of suicide by incurably ill patients than those who had encountered either of the other terms. Notably, the use of Freitod by the media is regarded as problematic.
"The word Freitod implies that the victim made a clear-sighted and rational decision. But all the evidence suggests that suicidal individuals typically have a very restricted perspective on their personal situation, their lives, and their surroundings - they exhibit a kind of emotional tunnel vision. Seen in this light, it is very difficult to describe such a decision as free or rational," Arendt pointed out.
"Our study underlines the fact that the media could play a major role in the prevention of suicides. Journalists should take care to choose the least 'loaded' term," said Arendt.
However, careful choice of words is "only one of the measures which empirical research has shown can reduce the incidence of suicide."
The World Health Organisation (WHO) has issued guidelines for news coverage of suicides.
In the English language, for example, the WHO-recommendation is not to refer to suicide as "successful" or as a "failed attempt" because these terms may elicit problematic associative meanings, implying that death is a desirable outcome. Instead, it is recommended to write "died by suicide.
The findings from the study are published in the journal Social Science & Medicine.
(With ANI inputs)