Bloemfontein: Frank Lampard`s first-half goal in Sunday`s 4-1 defeat to Germany, disallowed despite the ball bouncing about half a metre beyond the goal line, recalled Geoff Hurst`s famously controversial strike when the two nations met in the 1966 World Cup final.
In a strange twist, Hurst`s extra-time shot, which like Lampard`s effort came off the cross-bar, instead appeared not to have crossed the line. It was, however, adjudged a goal and it paved the way for England`s eventual 4-2 victory in Wembley.
Sunday`s incident in Bloemfontein came 44-years later and amid growing calls for the use of goal-line technology, including sensors, to assist referees and their assistants.
However, world football`s governing body FIFA has steadfastly refused to install the technology.`We want to keep football as a game of the people with a human face, so we don`t want technology on the field of play because we want to maintain the spontaneity of football - played, administered and controlled by human beings,` FIFA President Sepp Blatter said before the start of the 2010 World Cup.
The world football supremo also said he believed the `tremendous preparations programmes` that World Cup referees had endured in the run-up to the tournament would avoid big errors being made.
But the Bloemfontein blunder by Uruguayan referee Jorge Larrionda and his assistants may now serve to hasten the introduction of sensors and other technology-assisted measures.
These could include instant video replays allowing referees to review incidents during the course of a match.
It may help that Larrionda`s mistake instantly reverberated around the world media.`Scandal of the World Cup,` said Spanish sports daily Marca`s website - a sentiment echoed, using the same phrase, by Italian daily La Repubblica.
Even the Germans could do little but admit the Uruguayan match official`s mistake.
`The referee`s assistant should have seen it, it was clearly a goal,` said former team boss Franz Beckenbauer on German television.
In the World Cup final 44 years ago, Hurst scored for England with the ball bouncing out having come down on the goal line but Azerbaijani linesman Tofik Bakhramov said the ball crossed the line and awarded the goal.
Fortune favoured England in 1966 but this time the luck was against them with Der Spiegel saying: `Wembley is back, only the reverse of 1966.`
Despite his talk of accepting human imperfection, Blatter has not closed the door entirely to the use of technology.
`Technology on the field of play is put on ice. It is not out forever,` Blatter said.
IANS
By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.
Cookies Setting
By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device and the processing of information obtained via those cookies (including about your preferences, device and online activity) by us and our commercial partners to enhance site navigation, personalise ads, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. More information can be found in our Cookies and Privacy Policy. You can amend your cookie settings to reject non-essential cookies by clicking Cookie Settings below.
Manage Consent Preferences
Strictly Necessary Cookies
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work or you may not be able to login.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then some or all of these services may not function properly.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They are also used to limit the number of times you see an advert as well as help measure the effectiveness of an advertising campaign. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we may not know when you have visited our site, and may not be able to monitor its performance.