Karti Chidambaram's custody extended till March 9: Here's what happened in court

Karti was arrested on February 28, 2018, at Chennai Airport on his return from the United Kingdom, in connection with the FIR lodged on May 15, 2017.

Karti Chidambaram's custody extended till March 9: Here's what happened in court
Pic courtesy: PTI

New Delhi: Karti Chidambaram will undergo three more days of custodial interrogation, till March 9, 2018, in the INX Media case with a Delhi court on Tuesday extending his CBI custody.

His father and former Union finance minister P Chidambaram and mother, Nalini Chidambaram, also a senior advocate, were present in the courtroom during the hearing. The court had allowed him to meet them for ten minutes.

Karti was arrested on February 28, 2018, at Chennai Airport on his return from the United Kingdom, in connection with the FIR lodged on May 15, 2017, alleging irregularities in FIPB clearance to INX Media for receiving overseas funds worth about Rs 305 crore in 2007 when his father was the finance minister.

Following is what happened in the court on March 6, 2018:

- The agency, which produced Karti before special judge Sunil Rana after his five-day police custody expired, said an extension was needed as there were "new revelations". The further custodial interrogation was necessary to confront him with "new facts", it added.

- Though there was "substantial progress" in the last four days of investigation into the case, he "had not been cooperating" and not disclosing passwords to his phones, it said.

- His answer to every question was, "I am politically victimised", the agency added. The agency also alleged that witnesses in the case were being approached and evidence destroyed.

- The CBI, which had sought nine days of police custody of Karti, said he was taken to Mumbai and confronted with Indrani Mukerjea, one of the then promoters of INX Media, at the Byculla prison and her statement was just one of the evidence.

- "New revelations in the matter have come up day before yesterday. Cannot divulge much about investigation but we need his further custody to confront him with the new facts," Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Tushar Mehta, appearing for the CBI, told the court.

- He also opposed Karti's bail plea, saying the investigation was at a "crucial stage" and the CBI needs two weeks to file a detailed reply to his bail application.

- Senior advocate and Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Karti, said the CBI just wanted to keep him in custody by hook or by crook.

- "I have cooperated. I am not obliged to answer what you (CBI) want to hear. My duty is only to make myself available for questioning," Singhvi submitted.

- "The shifting of stands/reasons by the CBI to keep me in custody is a mala fide attempt on their part to get my custody," the senior advocate said.

- "Is Indrani's statement even an admissible evidence? She is in jail in the murder case of her daughter," he asked, adding that Karti was not a terrorist with a bomb that he could not be interrogated without being kept in custody.

- At the outset, the probe agency submitted before the court documents in a sealed cover related to the probe in the case over the last six days.

- On March 1, 2018, the court had allowed Karti's custodial interrogation by the CBI for five days, saying there was need to unearth the larger conspiracy in the INX Media case and his presence would serve an important purpose.

- In the remand application, CBI counsel VK Sharma on Tuesday said the agency was able to gather some information even though Karti was "evasive" while answering routine questions.

- While granting police custody, the court on March 1 had come to the conclusion that Karti's presence was needed for important and specific purposes connected with the completion of the investigation in the present case, the CBI said.

- The agency also reminded the court about its previous order in which it was stated that Karti's custody remand was necessary to confront him with documents, co-accused and to unearth the larger conspiracy and the role of other accused person involved in the case.

(With PTI inputs)

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. You can find out more by clicking this link

Close