Antulay questions Karkare’s death
Zeenews
       English        
 Follow Me on Pinterest Google Plus Ditto RSS Mail to us Mail to us
Friday, May 24, 2013 
Search
Nation

Antulay questions Karkare’s death

Last Updated: Wednesday, December 17, 2008, 00:00     A- A A+
Comments 101
Tags:
Antulay questions Karkare’s death Zeenews Bureau

New Delhi, Dec 17: Union Minorities Affairs Minister AR Antulay courted controversy on Wednesday by suspecting the truth behind Maharashtra Anti-Terror Squad chief Hemant Karkare’s killing during the Mumbai attacks. His divisive statement on such a sensitive issue is now bound to send ripples across the nation, with the Opposition already seeking a clarification from the Prime Minister.

Maintaining that "there is more than what meets the eyes", he said “Karkare was investigating some cases in which "there are non-Muslims also", an apparent reference to the Malegaon blasts case in which sadhvi Pragya Thakur and a Lt Colonel Shrikant Prasad Purohit were 11 persons to be arrested.

Union Minority Affairs Minister A R Antulay set off a major controversy today when he raised doubts over the killing of Maharashtra ATS chief Hemant Karkare by Pakistani terrorists, suggesting a link with the Malegaon blasts that were investigated by him.

Opposition parties were quick to attack the minister for his "misdemeanour" and demanded immediate clarification from the Prime Minister but the Congress party distanced itself saying they were his "personal remarks".

BJP and Shiv Sena members raked up the issue in Lok Sabha and demanded Home Minister P Chidambaram, who had moved two anti-terror bills, to clarify the situation.

Maintaining that "there is more than what meets the eyes", Antulay said Karkare was investigating some cases in which "there are non-Muslims also", an apparent reference to the Malegaon blasts case in which sadhvi Pragya Thakur and a Lt Colonel Shrikant Prasad Purohit were among the 11 persons to be arrested.

"Unfortunately his end came. It may be a separate inquiry how his (Karkare's) end came, he told reporters outside Parliament.

Antulay said "Karkare found that there are non Muslims involved in the acts terrorism during his investigations in some cases. Any person going to the roots of terror has always been the target, he said.

"Superficially speaking they (terrorists) had no reason to kill Karkare. Whether he (Karkare) was victim of terrorism or terrorism plus something. I do not know," he added.

Reacting to Antulay's remarks, Congress spokesman Abhishek Manu Singhvi they should be treated his "personal views" and Congress party does not not agree with them and does not not support such a formulation.

To a question, he said there was no no question embarrassment to the party.

Samajwadi Party MP Amar Singh, who himself was in the centre of a controversy when he had raised doubts over the killing of a Delhi police official in an encounter recently, said a senior leader like Antulay should before issuing any statement uphold the cherished tradition of collective wisdom of the Cabinet.

Not not completely disapproving the remarks, Union Minister Ram Vilas Paswan said Antulay must be having "more information" since he hails from Maharashtra.

Congress disassociates itself from Antulay's remarks

The Congress today disassociated itself from the statement of Minority Affairs Minister A R Antulay suggesting that the killing of Mumbai ATS chief Hemant Karkare could be due to his investigation of the Malegaon blast.

"If it (the statement of Antulay) is correct we do not accept the innuendo and the aspersions cast," Congress spokesman Abhishek Singhvi told reporters here.

Singhvi said the Congress does not accept expressing doubt and raising questions on the issue.

"This should be the end of the matter. The Congress does not agree with Antulay's statement," Singhvi said.

Anti-terror laws should cover communal riots'

Minority Affairs Minister A R Antulay today demanded that communal riots should be brought under the purview of the new anti- terror law being brought in by the government to combat terrorism.

"This law should also be applicable against communal rioters because rioters are also terrorists," he told reporters here adding that "this is his personal view that nobody can stop him from airing".

Referring to the killing of a large number of people in communal riots in independent India, he said those people who inflame communal riots should also be punished.

He, however, refused to answer whether this demand was raised in the cabinet and later shot down by the government.

For Zee News’s Updates, follow us on Twitter , Facebook, Google+, Pinterest

First Published: Wednesday, December 17, 2008, 00:00

Post your Comments

Name:
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Comments

Sharath Aiyangar - Chennai
What can be expected out of a Muslim like A R Antulay.Muslim in Indian support the attacker from within they had sent money to LeT they are very much pretending saying we are against terrorism. I want to ask we will not give any inch or our land or religion as all Muslim are treating non-Muslim. If they don`t want to stay here in India they can very well leave to Pakistan.Coming to the present issue Mr Antulay is very much a Muslim his question is very much baseless and there is no ground and fellow congress men now have no shame that i know.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
i_flux - peshawar
its very simple indian govt. want to blame pakistan for all mess but people here and there are finding connections to these events that may be its just a inside job! you know everybody is not dumb fuck who believes news completely. rxtremism in india is most severe case no one can deny that but govt want secure powerful hindu extrmist movements as govt need votes from hindu extremists.if in these crucial days of election ATS had brought names of army-hindu extremist connections it can highly damage the political face of the party. so it was necessary to remove him! so called secularity of india can be saved!
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
agd - usa
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fCNtI_ESOgA

I was watching video footage on youtube just after Mr Karkare was killed, in that footage it was apparent that the terrorists were in a police van and not hiding behind some trees or bushes like most news sites were broadcasting. The van was supposed to have been taken after killing the top cops . Mr Karkare was a smart man and to reach the level he was at you either have to be corrupt or have to be really smart. I don`t think he was corrupt. Now the question of landing at the place in the situation he was in and with the police van taken over by the terrorists before the attack on the top cops does not add up, inside betrayal. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fCNtI_ESOgA

Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
usman inamsu - agra india
Yar is wakt yeh important nahai ke Karkare (shaheed) ko kis ne shoot kia, aur kia koi conspiricy is event ke peeche hai ya nahai, lets focus on how to implicate pakistani and more important pakistan in Mumbai terror attack.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
pramod - thane
THE CEMENT SCAM BARRON`` ANTULAY IS ON PAYROLL OF ISI OR LET OR DAWOOD. ONLY PAKISTAN CAN BENEFIT FROM HIS STATEMENTSANTULAYS BANK ACCOUNTS INDIAN /FOREIGN SHOULD BE SCRUTINIZED FOR PAY -OFF ANY MUSLIM OR HINDU SHOULD NOT VOTE HIM FOR HE IS DIVIDING HINDU AND MUSLIMS
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Iwan - Bangalore
Mr. Abdul Rehman Antulay said that the terrorists who attacked Mumbai had no reason to kill Karkare. Ok, agree, but how do you know that Mr. Abdul Rehman Antuley? The only way you can know that is if you are an insider among terrorists, good enough to know the intent of terrorists.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Kishor - Mumbai
Barritser Antuley could have checked his points with Invetigating Agencies. Being a minister he has access to. It is once again proved that how our politicians are irrresponssible even in national issues. All the seriousness of Mumbai Attack was washed by his foolish statement.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
A Patriot - Kuwait
I agree with veteran and secular leader Antulay on one issue: from day one (after 3 top cops travelled in one car and shot dead as sitting duck without firing a single bullet) I was wondering on the same issue.Why they travelled in one care and going towards a non-combat area?I don`t agree with Antulay`s Malegaon angle but `soft dismissal` of such experienced top cops in a non-combatant area that night needs to be investigated.Its indeed intiguing matter.Was Karkare`s energies and mind too much engrossed with Sadhvi/Malegaon probe.He looked very fatigued on TV just before news of their being shot.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
K.Venugopal - Mumbai
What Antulay is saying is that Hindus hired mercenaries of Pakistani origin to carry out the Mumbai attack so that Islamic terrorism is back on centre stage. Improbable, but then Muslims have always lived in a world of denial – the basic denial being Islam is a religion of violence.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
jagrukh - india
antuley per mcoca lagana chahiye aur new national investigeting agency ko first case antuley ka dena chahiye taki malum chal sake ki iska link kis terror group se hai,i think he is the agent of pakistan
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

View all Comments   

Most liked Comments

Top News



latest