SC to decide Bajaj Auto-TVS row over Flame on Sep 15
Zeenews
       English        
Saturday, May 26, 2012 
Search
Follwo us on: Facebook Follwo us on: Twiter RSS Mail to us Mail to us Mail to us
Companies & Commodities

SC to decide Bajaj Auto-TVS row over Flame on Sep 15

Last Updated: Monday, August 31, 2009, 21:44
Comments 0  
Tags: Bajaj AutoFlameTVS
SC to decide Bajaj Auto-TVS row over Flame on Sep 15 New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday posted a dispute between Chennai-based two-wheeler company TVS Motor Company and Bajaj Auto over rights to twin-spark plugs technology to September 15 for final disposal.

It continued its earlier interim order of June 8 that allowed TVS Motor to manufacture TVS Flame, a 125-cc bike sporting twin-spark plugs, the technology for which Bajaj Auto claims it holds the patent rights.

However, it did not permit TVS to move its "finished product (motorcycle) from its warehouse" as the company had given an undertaking in this regard.

The Bench had earlier issued notice to the Chennai company and allowed it to manufacture TVS Flame, but said that "no finished product would leave the respondent's (TVS) warehouse".

"Both parties are restrained from using this order for any other purposes including publicity," the Bench stated.

The order came on a petition filed by Bajaj Auto Ltd challenging the Madras High Court's ruling that permitted the Chennai-based two-wheeler company to use twin-spark plugs in its motorcycles.

The single Bench of the High Court had earlier restrained TVS from manufacturing, marketing and selling its 125cc motorcycle TVS Flame after Bajaj Auto alleged that the bike used twin spark plugs for combustion, which is its patented technology.

Bajaj had alleged that its patent on twin spark plug engines had been infringed by its arch-rival TVS.

The Bajaj side said that it is the grantee of the Indian patent in respect of its invention titled "An improved internal combustion engine working on four stroke principle" since July 16, 2002.

However, TVS said that the company should be allowed to manufacture the product as it is willing to give an undertaking that during the interim period its finished products would not leave its warehouse.

Bureau Report

First Published: Monday, August 31, 2009, 21:44

Comments


View all Comments   

Post your Comments

Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Most liked Comments