Court acquits 2 youths, accused of gangrape
Zeenews
       English        
 Follow Me on Pinterest Google Plus Ditto RSS Mail to us Mail to us
Saturday, May 18, 2013 
Search
Delhi

Court acquits 2 youths, accused of gangrape

Last Updated: Tuesday, April 24, 2012, 15:54     A- A A+
Comments 1
New Delhi: Two youths accused of gangraping a 34-year-old woman in a desolate forest area here have been let off by a Delhi court on grounds of inconsistency in the victim's statements.

Observing that the woman's deposition before the court and her statements to police were "full of contradictions," Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) Vijay Kumar Dahiya acquitted West Delhi residents Imran Ansari and Jitender, facing trial for allegedly kidnapping and raping the married woman.

"As such, the three statements of the prosecutrix (victim) are full of material contradictions pertaining to the manner in which she was subjected to rape, number of accused who committed rape upon her as well as place of incident," the court said.

The woman, working as a labourer, had lodged a complaint with the police alleging that she was kidnapped by one Ansari on March 3, 2010, when she was on her way to her friend's house in quest of a job as an agriculture labour.

She said she was pulled by Ansari and Jitender in his car from the roadside and on the way they were joined by some other people and she was taken to a room, built in a desolate jungle in Nazafgarh area in West Delhi, where they all raped her.

She told police that after having been raped she managed to escape to nearby village from where she went to police and lodged the complaint.

Though the police arrested Jitender and Ansari, it could not arrest others as she was not able to identify them.

The court, however, after the trial let the accused off, pointing out various inconsistencies in her statement.

PTI

For Zee News’s Updates, follow us on Twitter , Facebook, Google+, Pinterest

First Published: Tuesday, April 24, 2012, 15:54

Post your Comments

Name:
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Comments

Indian - N.Delhi
Vijay Kumar Dahiya . How can you expect a village women who has been gang raped to openly describe the nightmare she went through in public (Court room)? Moreover she is a village woman who will even hesitate to come in the presence of men .So this could be the cause of inconsistency. On what basis the ASJ came to the conclusion that her statements are inconsistence, it is a normal behavior of any traumatized human being difficult to recollect and present with clarity. So this could be the cause of inconsistency. You must consult a psychologist/psychiatrist with regard to this. If she is illiterate how she will know what is written in the statement which will be produced on behalf of her, she is at the mercy of the corrupt government official. The lousy defense govt lawyer would have stuck a deal with this mad dog criminal rapist and not done his job. The moral of the story is the woman poor and uneducated and Justice is not for such kind of people where as their votes are craved during elections. This case should be taken to the highest courts and with a more efficient lawyer for justice. Somebody find justice for this voiceless woman.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

View all Comments   

Most liked Comments

Indian - N.Delhi
Vijay Kumar Dahiya . How can you expect a village women who has been gang raped to openly describe the nightmare she went through in public (Court room)? Moreover she is a village woman who will even hesitate to come in the presence of men .So this could be the cause of inconsistency. On what basis the ASJ came to the conclusion that her statements are inconsistence, it is a normal behavior of any traumatized human being difficult to recollect and present with clarity. So this could be the cause of inconsistency. You must consult a psychologist/psychiatrist with regard to this. If she is illiterate how she will know what is written in the statement which will be produced on behalf of her, she is at the mercy of the corrupt government official. The lousy defense govt lawyer would have stuck a deal with this mad dog criminal rapist and not done his job. The moral of the story is the woman poor and uneducated and Justice is not for such kind of people where as their votes are craved during elections. This case should be taken to the highest courts and with a more efficient lawyer for justice. Somebody find justice for this voiceless woman.



Top News



latest

Nation

2G case: Evasive witness apologises after warning


Read More »