`2010 temperature lifted ice loss in Greenland`
Zeenews
       English        
 Follow Me on Pinterest Google Plus Ditto RSS Mail to us Mail to us
Eco News

'2010 temperature lifted ice loss in Greenland'

Last Updated: Saturday, December 10, 2011, 18:38     A- A A+
Comments 10
`2010 temperature lifted ice loss in Greenland` Washington: Data from the GPS stations has indicated that an unusually hot melting season in 2010 accelerated ice loss in southern Greenland by 100 billion tons – and large portions of the island’s bedrock rose an additional quarter of an inch in response.

The finding was concluded from a network of nearly 50 GPS stations planted along the Greenland coast to measure the bedrock’s natural response to the ever-diminishing weight of ice above it.

Every year as the Greenland Ice Sheet melts, the rocky coast rises, explained Michael Bevis, Ohio Eminent Scholar in Geodynamics and professor in the School of Earth Sciences at Ohio State University.

Some GPS stations around Greenland routinely detect uplift of 15 mm (0.59 inches) or more, year after year. But a temperature spike in 2010 lifted the bedrock a detectably higher amount over a short five-month period – as high as 20 mm (0.79 inches) in some locations.

“Pulses of extra melting and uplift imply that we’ll experience pulses of extra sea level rise. The process is not really a steady process,” Bevis said at the American Geophysical Union meeting in San Francisco.

Greenland GPS Network (GNET) measurements indicate that as that ice melted away, the bedrock beneath it rose. The amount of uplift differed from station to station, depending on how close the station was to regions where ice loss was greatest.

Southern Greenland stations that were very close to zones of heavy ice loss rose as much as 20 mm (about 0.79 inches) over the five months. Even stations that were located far away typically rose at least 5 mm (0.2 inches) during the course of the 2010 melting season. But stations in the North of Greenland barely moved at all.

ANI

For Zee News’s Updates, follow us on Twitter , Facebook, Google+, Pinterest

First Published: Saturday, December 10, 2011, 18:38

Post your Comments

Name:
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Comments

Michael_S - Alabama
The same thig is going to occur in the Hymalas only more slowly because of continental mass.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Michael_S - Alabama
Rebound occurrs every where, usually at a very modest rate of less than 1/2 an inch per year. the ice sheet which covered most of the North American continent took thousands of years to recede, and the crust has been rebounding ever since. However, Greenland is really a group of islands not a single land mass island. The crust under the Greenland ice sheet is considerably thinner than the Great Lakes region, as a result the removal(by melting) of a large mass of ice over a thinner crust will result in a ``faster`` rebound. This is basic mathand science. For example, take your college buddy`s waterbed and place a card table(upsidedown) in the center, than place a bunch of books in the center. Now slowly remove the books. This is a crude example, but it still works. Remember for greenland there is no table, but a set of tv trays laying side by side, which is why the up lift is not uniform.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Brandon Chozah - india
Wow! At scott, how could the ice lift up the earth`s surface? No way, the earth`s surface is below the ice. So, when the ice melts, the earth`s surface rises up. It`s because the ice melts away, no more ice, the remaining is only the earth`s surface. So, it`s observed.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
west129 - Versailles
I am scared of those deniers and I am getting very confused at the same time. I thought the sea would rise and swallow most all land. Now I hear that land is raised from the sea to result more real estate. What earth-shaking new hypothesis are the AGW speculators to come up with next?
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Higgs Boson - USA
What`s the problem. The canadian shield has been rebounding for years after the loss of it`s glaciers. Just think- Greenland might become habitable again since the 1300s
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Alex M - Canada
Ohh noo, it`s not a ``usual process``... we`re all DOOOOOOOOOMED.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
climater - michigan
you climate change deniers need to be able to look at yourself in the mirror. With what face are you going to tell your children and grandchildren that you helped kill the planet. Without any knowledge or understanding of science and knowledge, you spout off your mouth like you actually know something. Shame!
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Climate isn't Static - The Desert
Do you really believe that climate is a static system? That climate never, ever changes and is a system that repeats the exact same results for ever and ever? Of course not! Climate is a static system that is in a continual and never ending state of flux, which inlcudes increases and decreases in temperature. This is represented by the glaciation and de-glaciation of the planet of eons. Note that the last glacial period ended roughly 14,000 years ago and the climate has been warming ever since. This dynamic climate system will continue to change in ways both predictable and unpredictable. Humans are not killing the planet as the planet is not dying - it is evolving through continuous dynamic change that occurs both beneath the planet`s crust and above the planet`s crust, including the climate. Get over your self-absorbed, self-centered belief that we humans are responsible for the natural processes that dictate the future of our planet.
Reply

Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Shiv - Mysore
I think you have a valid point there. I am not saying you are right. Just that we know very little but make big noises.
Reply

Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
jiminy cricket - my town
What does science have to do with self-absorption? Everything if you don`t believe in science. Just because someone forms an opinion based on the otherwise relatively complicated science behind global climate change doesn`t mean, ipso facto, that the person is self-absorbed. Apparently, though, someone who has a different opinion than yours is self-absorbed. So much for civilized discussion?
Reply

Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Wes Evans - Oviedo Florida
I did not notice any mention of tectonic uplift or volcanic activity was any of this present?
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Scott_G - Canada
SILLY, To think people beleive this stuff, The FACT is we have had earthquakes around the world that have move continents. If anything what happened in Japan has caused movement in the earths crust. As for Greenland, there is 3KM of ice there If it melted 1meter per year thats 3 thousand years before there would be a 7 meter rise in oceans. Problem is each year new snow and rain turns to ice. NOTICE, they are talking about the south of Greenland. Most of greenland is to far north, too cold. These articles are spun to support the bad science around global warming.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Jerry M - USA
Very astute observation Scott. What most people don`t know is that much of the interior of Greenlands ``earth surface`` is below sea level. so if all the ice melted from Greenland, there would be a huge freshewater sea in the middle of it. Greenland is also incircled by major faultlines..
Reply

Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Jesse B - Oregon
The reason the interior of Greenland is below sea level, is because the ice is pushing it down. When the ice melts, the land rises, as is being observed.
Reply

Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Scott_G - Canada
UPLIFTING.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
jane - New Mexico
so, how do you account for the measurable and measured rebound that is occurring in the great lakes? That has been measured for a lot longer time.
Reply

Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Jesse B - Oregon
Yes, in this case the uplift is simple isostatic rebound due to the ice melting.
Reply

Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

View all Comments   

Most liked Comments

Scott_G - Canada
SILLY, To think people beleive this stuff, The FACT is we have had earthquakes around the world that have move continents. If anything what happened in Japan has caused movement in the earths crust. As for Greenland, there is 3KM of ice there If it melted 1meter per year thats 3 thousand years before there would be a 7 meter rise in oceans. Problem is each year new snow and rain turns to ice. NOTICE, they are talking about the south of Greenland. Most of greenland is to far north, too cold. These articles are spun to support the bad science around global warming.



climater - michigan
you climate change deniers need to be able to look at yourself in the mirror. With what face are you going to tell your children and grandchildren that you helped kill the planet. Without any knowledge or understanding of science and knowledge, you spout off your mouth like you actually know something. Shame!



Climate isn't Static - The Desert
Do you really believe that climate is a static system? That climate never, ever changes and is a system that repeats the exact same results for ever and ever? Of course not! Climate is a static system that is in a continual and never ending state of flux, which inlcudes increases and decreases in temperature. This is represented by the glaciation and de-glaciation of the planet of eons. Note that the last glacial period ended roughly 14,000 years ago and the climate has been warming ever since. This dynamic climate system will continue to change in ways both predictable and unpredictable. Humans are not killing the planet as the planet is not dying - it is evolving through continuous dynamic change that occurs both beneath the planet`s crust and above the planet`s crust, including the climate. Get over your self-absorbed, self-centered belief that we humans are responsible for the natural processes that dictate the future of our planet.



Top News



latest