Fossils hint at evolution of animal kingdom
Zeenews
       English        
Sunday, May 27, 2012 
Search
Follwo us on: Facebook Follwo us on: Twiter RSS Mail to us Mail to us Mail to us
Eco News

Fossils hint at evolution of animal kingdom

Last Updated: Friday, December 23, 2011, 15:27
Comments 2  
Fossils hint at evolution of animal kingdom Washington: Scientists have found fossils that shed light on the evolutionary origin of animals from single-cell ancestors.

The fossils preserve stages in the life cycle of an amoeba-like organism dividing in asexual cycles, first to produce two cells, then four, eight, 16, 32 and so on, ultimately resulting in hundreds of thousands of spore-like cells that were then released to start the cycle over again.

The pattern of cell division is so similar to the early stages of animal, including human, embryology that until now they were thought to represent the embryos of the earliest animals.

The researchers studied the microscopic fossils using high energy X-rays at the Swiss Light Source in Switzerland, revealing the organisation of the cells within their protective cyst walls.

The organisms should not have been fossilized, they were just gooey clusters of cells, but they were buried in sediments rich in phosphate that impregnated the cell walls and turned them to stone.

“We used a particle accelerator called a synchrotron as our X-ray source. It allowed us to make a perfect computer model of the fossil that we could cut up in any way that we wanted, but without damaging the fossil in any way. We would never have been able to study the fossils otherwise!” John Cunningham, the study co-author, said.

This X-ray microscopy revealed that the fossils had features that multicellular embryos do not, and this led the researchers to the conclusion that the fossils were neither animals nor embryos but rather the reproductive spore bodies of single-celled ancestors of animals.

“We were very surprised by our results – we’ve been convinced for so long that these fossils represented the embryos of the earliest animals – much of what has been written about the fossils for the last ten years is flat wrong. Our colleagues are not going to like the result,” Philip Donoghue, said.

The study has been recently reported in Science.

ANI

First Published: Friday, December 23, 2011, 15:26

Comments

qedlin - madera,ca
Bill - such will be the legacy of the cult of Chuckie D. They will continue to misinterpret data to force it into their naturalistic belief sytem, regardless of what the real science says.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Andrew Feinberg - San Jose, CA
Yeah, because ``real science`` is all about instantly knowledge, not progressive understanding through theory, experimentation, and investigation. You know what they say, if you`re ever less than 100% sure about your conclusions, you should abandon your research and write that whole branch of science off as a bad idea.
Reply

Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Anthony K - Pennsylvania
Biological evolution through natural ion has survived a century and a half of scrutiny and refinement. There are (literally) mountains of evidence that support this wonderful idea. But if you would care to back up your claim that data have been misinterpreted, all of science would benefit. To call the central tenet of biology a cult really is laughable, however, and betrays your real agenda. If you have any evidence (i.e., reality-based observations), let`s hear about it.
Reply

Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Jasterthemaster - Alaska
Hmm... the way i interpret what your saying .. your wrong... science is testing.. you test on what info you have and provide a logical explanation ... now that there is NEW more detailed information available they can come to more accurate logical explanations.. if that Data had been available 10 years ago.. they wouldn`t have put forth the embryo idea .. but who is to say this new explanation is anymore correct.. its just a logical guess.. until theres a time machine built that can take us back there to actually record and analyze it back then..history isnt what i would call an ``exact`` science key information can be lost so there are most of the times multiple explanations stemming from the same item
Reply

Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
CRW - Detroit, Michigan
``Cult of Chuckie D.`` What an interesting insult. Life origins and early life are where the data are the sketchiest. What this finding says is that some the earliest microscopic fossils weren`t what people thought. This has no bearing whatsoever on whether or not evolution is true.
Reply

Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
bill g - sheridan, wy
the surer we are, the wronger we is. it hasn`t changed
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Anthony K - Pennsylvania
Isaac Asimov wrote a wonderful piece, ``The Relativity of Wrong.`` Bill, it might be worth reading. An excerpt: ``John, when people thought the earth was flat, they were wrong. When people thought the earth was spherical, they were wrong. But if you think that thinking the earth is spherical is just as wrong as thinking the earth is flat, then your view is wronger than both of them put together. The basic trouble, you see, is that people think that ``right`` and ``wrong`` are absolute, that everything that isn`t perfectly and completely right is totally and equally wrong.``
Reply

Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Rath - Earth
Indeed, mislabeling a moth a butterfly is much less wrong than labeling it a faerie.
Reply

Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

View all Comments   

Post your Comments

Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Most liked Comments

Anthony K - Pennsylvania
Isaac Asimov wrote a wonderful piece, ``The Relativity of Wrong.`` Bill, it might be worth reading. An excerpt: ``John, when people thought the earth was flat, they were wrong. When people thought the earth was spherical, they were wrong. But if you think that thinking the earth is spherical is just as wrong as thinking the earth is flat, then your view is wronger than both of them put together. The basic trouble, you see, is that people think that ``right`` and ``wrong`` are absolute, that everything that isn`t perfectly and completely right is totally and equally wrong.``



qedlin - madera,ca
Bill - such will be the legacy of the cult of Chuckie D. They will continue to misinterpret data to force it into their naturalistic belief sytem, regardless of what the real science says.



bill g - sheridan, wy
the surer we are, the wronger we is. it hasn`t changed