Not just birds, human noise affects plants too
Man-made noise doesn’t just affects birds and other animals, it has ripple effects on plants too, researchers say.
London: Man-made noise doesn’t just affects birds and other animals, it has ripple effects on plants too, researchers say.
A growing body of research found that birds and other animals change their behaviour in response to manmade noise, such as the din of traffic or the hum of machinery.
But because many animals also pollinate plants or eat or disperse their seeds, human noise can have ripple effects on plants too, according to a new study.
In cases where noise has ripple effects on long-lived plants like trees, the consequences could last for decades, even after the source of the noise goes away, said lead author Clinton Francis of the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center in Durham, North Carolina.
In previous studies, Francis and colleagues found that some animals increase in numbers near noisy sites, while others decline. But could animals’ different responses to manmade noise have indirect effects on plants, too?
Because they can’t move, many plants rely on birds and other animals to deliver pollen from one flower to the next, or to disperse their seeds.
To find out what animal responses to noise might mean for plants, the researchers conducted a series of experiments from 2007 to 2010 in the Bureau of Land Management’s Rattlesnake Canyon Wildlife Area in north-western New Mexico.
The region is home to thousands of natural gas wells, many of which are coupled with noisy compressors for extracting the gas and transporting it through pipelines. The compressors roar and rumble day and night, every day of the year.
To find out what animal responses to manmade noise might mean for plants, first the researchers did an experiment using patches of artificial plants designed to mimic a common red wildflower in the area called scarlet gilia.
Each patch consisted of five artificial plants with three “flowers” each — microcentrifuge tubes wrapped in red electrical tape — which were filled with a fixed amount of sugar water for nectar. To help in estimating pollen transfer within and between the patches, the researchers also dusted the flowers of one plant per patch with artificial pollen, using a different colour for each patch.
Din levels at noisy patches were similar to a highway heard from 500 meters away, Francis explained. When the researchers compared the number of pollinator visits at noisy and quiet sites, they found that one bird species in particular — the black-chinned hummingbird (Archilochus alexandri) — made five times more visits to noisy sites than quiet ones.
“Black-chinned hummingbirds may prefer noisy sites because another bird species that preys on their nestlings, the western scrub jay, tends to avoid those areas,” Francis explained.
Pollen transfer was also more common in the noisy sites. If more hummingbird visits and greater pollen transfer translate to higher seed production for the plants, the results suggested, “hummingbird-pollinated plants such as scarlet gilia may indirectly benefit from noise,” Francis said.
Another set of experiments revealed that noise may indirectly benefit some plants, but is bad news for others.
In a second series of experiments at the same study site, the researchers set out to find out what noise might mean for tree seeds and seedlings, using one of the dominant trees in the area — the pinon pine (Pinus edulis).
Pinon pine seeds that aren’t plucked from their cones fall to the ground and are eaten by birds and other animals. To find out if noise affected the number of pinon pine seeds that animals ate, the researchers scattered pinon pine seeds underneath 120 pinon pine trees in noisy and quiet sites, using a motion-triggered camera to figure out what animals took the seeds.
After three days, a number of animals were spotted feeding on the seeds, including mice, chipmunks, squirrels, birds and rabbits. But two animals in particular differed between quiet and noisy sites —mice, which preferred noisy sites, and western scrub jays, which avoided them altogether.
Pinon pine seeds that are eaten by mice don’t survive the passage through the animal’s gut, Francis explained, so the boost in mouse populations near noisy sites could be bad news for pine seedlings in those areas.
In contrast, a single western scrub jay may take hundreds to thousands of seeds, only to hide them in the soil to eat later in the year. The seeds they fail to relocate will eventually germinate, so the preference of western scrub jays for quiet areas means that pinon pines in those areas are likely to benefit.
In keeping with their seed results, the researchers counted the number of pinon pine seedlings and found that they were four times as abundant in quiet sites compared with noisy ones.
It may take decades for a pinon pine to grow from a seedling into a full-grown tree, Francis said. This means the consequences of noise may last longer than we thought.
“Fewer seedlings in noisy areas might eventually mean fewer mature trees, but because pinon pines are so slow-growing the shift could have gone undetected for years” he explained.
“Fewer pinon pine trees would mean less critical habitat for the hundreds of species that depend on them for survival,” he added.
The study appears in the March 21 issue of Proceedings of the Royal Society B.