close
This ad will auto close in 10 seconds

'Pakistan can’t take Narendra Modi’s restraint for granted for long'

"Even as he walked back threats of military action, he replaced them with a pledge to isolate Pakistan internationally."


'Pakistan can’t take Narendra Modi’s restraint for granted for long'

Washington: Prime Minister Narendra Modi may have reacted responsibly to extreme provocation by Pakistan in the form of the Uri terror attack but Islamabad cannot take India’s “strategic restraint” for granted for too long, The Wall Street Journal said.
 
The US daily said in an opinion piece that Pakistan’s actions, despite PM Modi’s offer for cooperation, will lead to the country getting more isolated on the world stage.
 
"Modi is practicing restraint for now, but Islamabad can't rely on that continuing. Modi's offer of cooperation, if rejected, will become part of a case for making Pakistan even more of a pariah nation than it already is," the paper said.
 
"If the (Pakistani) military continues to send arms and fighters across the border, the Indian Prime Minister will have a strong justification to take action," it warned.
 
The Wall Street Journal said India has always enjoyed the moral high ground on the terrorism issue, but past Congress and BJP governments lacked the courage to assert it forthrightly.
 
That led to a policy of "strategic restraint", which meant that Pakistan would never be held accountable for its terrorist proxies, no matter how heinous their attacks, it noted.
 
Praising Modi for deciding against taking any military action, the daily said even as he walked back threats of military action, he replaced them with a pledge to isolate Pakistan internationally if the military doesn't stop supporting terrorist groups.
 
Modi is considering the cancellation of the 1960 Indus Water Treaty, which protects Pakistan's rights to the Indus River's water. He could also withdraw most-favoured-nation trading status, granted in 1996, that Pakistan has never reciprocated, the daily said.
 
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs, Sameer Lalwani, Deputy Director of the Stimson Center's South Asia program, said in the wake of the Uri attack, the understandable anger and frustration of Indian policymakers and strategies is building momentum for major military action.
 
"But the arguments for such action are highly debatable, if not incorrect.
 
A major militarised response might satisfy a desire for revenge, but it is not clear that it would serve the Indian government's political, credibility, prestige, or coercive interests," Lalwani said.
 
With PTI inputs

From Zee News

0 Comment - Join the Discussions

trending

photo gallery

video

DNA EXCLUSIVES

Presidential poll reveals how infighting and bruised egos weakened the grand alliance

The Doklam Deadlock: India and China need to defuse crisis immediately

The Whimper of the Dragon: New Delhi's response has rattled Beijing into 1962 hysteria

A soldier’s perennial dilemma over the use of lethal force

SP MP Naresh Agrawal made hurtful comments, media just did its job