Tharoor makes strong plea for HC bench in TVM, Iyer disagrees
Kochi: Union minister Shashi Tharoor on Friday once again made a strong plea for a Kerala High Court bench at Thiruvananthapuram even as eminent jurist and former Supreme Court Judge VR Krishna Iyer said he was against "slicing" of the High Court.
Majority of the states have multiple benches, Tharoor, who represents Thiruvanthapuram in Parliament, said at a conference here on the `Future of Law, Justice and Governance in India`, organised as part of the 99th birthday celebrations of Justice Krishna Iyer.
Criticising the decision of the Bar Association to boycott the conference and issuing directive to lawyers to stay away from it, Tharoor said "this was a new low in the history of public life".
Those behind such things should be ashamed to call themselves lawyers and were `disgrace` to the profession, he said.
The minister said he had looked forward to engaging with some leading members of the bar association on the question of High Court bench in the Kerala capital.
He said the volume of cases in Kerala had grown so much that today there were at least 20,000 cases pending cases, 50 per cent of which involve state government as litigant.
The state government was spending over Rs 3 crore by way of TA/DA for officials to testify in the High Court, he said.
This was not only expenditure for government but officials had to be away from their work for at least two days to appear for a few minutes before the High Court here.
There was a bench in Thiruvananthapuram in 1956, and by the present demand an attempt was being made only to revive it, Tharoor said, adding, several states were having multiple benches. The only exceptions were Orissa, Madhya Pradesh and Kerala.
The minister of state for human resource development said successive Chief Justices of the High Court had not stated the reason for turning down the plea for a bench in the state capital.
Justice Krishna Iyer said he stood for the integrity of the High Court.
There may be requirements for benches as decentralisation was essential in a democracy. But integrity of the High Court was essential in its entirety and wholeness, he said, adding, he had written to the Chief Justice last month stating `not to slice` the High Court.
Pointing that a five-judge bench had been constituted to look into the issue, Iyer said he wanted the Chief Justice to preserve the importance of the High Court.
It should not be pieces of High Court, but it should be one. District wise division of high courts-- one in Kozhikode, Malappuram etc cannot be allowed, he said. The need of the hour is to provide justice to the people.
Chief Justice Manjula Chellur inaugurated the conference organised by OP Jindal Global University, Menon Institute of Legal Advocacy Training and Peoples Council for Social Justice.
- President's Rule to continue in Uttarakhand, next hearing in SC on May 3
- Panel discussion on AgustaWestland chopper scam and Sonia Gandhi's role
- Panel discussion on AgustaWestland chopper scam and Sonia Gandhi's role - Part II
- Panel discussion on AgustaWestland chopper scam and Sonia Gandhi's role - Part III
- Panel discussion on AgustaWestland chopper scam and Sonia Gandhi's role - Part IV
- JNU teachers claim 'sex racket, use of drugs, alcohol rampant inside campus'
- These 5 apps are quietly eating up your data plan! Know which ones
- Bipasha Basu - Karan Singh Grover wedding: Check out interesting details about mehendi ceremony
- Currently no proposal to merge BSNL and MTNL: Ravi Shankar Prasad
- Indian Premier League 2016, Match 23: Delhi Daredevils vs Gujarat Lions — As it happened...