MCOCA can be applied even when financial gain is not motive: HC
Zeenews
       English        
Tuesday, May 29, 2012 
Search
Follwo us on: Facebook Follwo us on: Twiter RSS Mail to us Mail to us Mail to us
Maharashtra

MCOCA can be applied even when financial gain is not motive: HC

Last Updated: Friday, August 05, 2011, 19:44
Comments 2  
Mumbai: In a significant judgement, Bombay High Court on Friday said that the stringent provisions of Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) can be applied even in cases where a crime syndicate has committed a crime for a motive other than the monetary benefit.

A full bench of Chief Justice Mohit Shah, Justice BR Gavai and Justice Roshan Dalvi was hearing a reference made by a division bench of High Court, as to whether the words "other advantages" in section 2 (e) of MCOCA mean something other than the financial gain.

Section 2 (e) defines 'organised crime' as any continuing unlawful activity with the objective of gaining pecuniary (monetary) benefits, or gaining undue economic advantage or other advantages for himself or any person or promoting insurgency.

"We have decided in favour of the state government," the bench said, pronouncing the judgement.

The trigger for referring the matter to a full bench was the special MCOCA court's order revoking charges under the act against the alleged killers of lawyer Shahid Azmi, who was shot dead here in February 2010.

The crime branch had invoked the MCOCA provisions against the four accused, but the lower court said that there was no material to prove that the offence was committed for monetary benefit, so charges under MCOCA cannot be pressed.

The state government appealed against the order before a division bench which referred the matter to the full bench.

"The full bench judgement can now be relied upon by the state government while arguing appeals against revocation of MCOCA on the ground that there have been no monetary gains... like (in) the Shahid Azmi murder case. We had pointed out to the court several instances where the offence would have been committed for advantages other than the monetary gains, such as the murder of a witness in a high profile case or a fake encounter case," additional public prosecutor Aruna Kamat-Pai said.

Senior counsel Baba Chitnis, appearing for some of the accused in Azmi murder case, said his clients would appeal against the order in the Supreme Court.

PTI

First Published: Friday, August 05, 2011, 19:37

Comments

harihar guin - delhi
The section 2(1)(e) is the vital organ of the MCOC Act ans act as safety valve for common public.. In the entire Act only portion where Police cannot manipulate this particular section.The two sections 2(1)(d) & 2(1)(f) are within police domain and 100% probability that the same can be manipulated and misused except this section. This section restrict the section 23 to be invoked arbitrarily.In case the `pecuniary benefits` from the section is removed and not made mandatory then misuse would be rampant and even in landlord tenant case the Police can invoke MCOCA. It is necessary that section 26 of the Act must also be removed from the act. It would be disaster in case the above judgment become precedent.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
ashok kumar tiwari - delhi
there is no clarification about ``other advantages in section 2[e] of mcoca . so it can be misused by police authority against innocent person because an offence committed by a person has some kind of advantages.hence it needs clarification from the honowrable s.c. of india
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

View all Comments   

Post your Comments

Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Most liked Comments