PIL against Tatkare withdrawn as HC refuses to hea
Mumbai: A PIL, seeking a CBI probe against Maharashtra Minister Sunil Tatkare and his family members for allegedly amassing assets disproportionate to their known sources of income, was on Monday withdrawn after the Bombay High Court said it was not inclined to entertain it.
A division bench of Justices S A Bobade and Mridula Bhatkar told the petitioner Rajendra Phanse, General Secretary of Thane-based political party `Dharmarajya Paksha`, that he should have gone to some forum to file a complaint before approaching the High Court.
The bench observed that the petitioner had options such as approaching an investigating agency or the government over the allegations, before moving the High Court.
Phanse alleged that Tatkare`s family members have acquired several properties in Raigad district during his tenure as a Cabinet minister.
Tatkare`s son Aniket and daughter Aditi are directors in 25 private companies, through which, over 250 acres of land was purchased at Dughadwadi and Ambivali in 2008-09, the petition alleged.
Phanse sought a CBI inquiry, claiming that as the Home Department is with NCP, to which, Tatkare belonged, the police would not conduct a fair investigation.
More from India
More from World
More from Sports
More from Entertaiment
- Sheena's diary reveals disturbed relationship with parents: DNA reports
- Sheena case: Indrani quizzed jointly with Peter, denies killing daughter
- PM Modi's Buddha mantra for peace at Global Hindu Buddhist Conclave
- Govt extended last date for e-filing of I-T return to Sept 7
- DNA: Bharat Bandh hits normal life; Bengal, Kerala among most affected
- Sheena Bora murder saga: 12 questions that police asked Peter Mukerjea during 12-hour grilling?
- Sunny Leone steamy condom ad (uncensored): Watch why this video is making news
- Indrani Mukerjea confesses to her role in Sheena Bora murder case
- 'Insulted' Samajwadi Party walks out of 'Janata Parivar', to contest Bihar polls alone
- BJP-RSS review meet, Day 2: NDA's education policy, Patel quota stir on agenda