26/11: Pak judicial panel fails to arrive in India
New Delhi: Putting the ongoing trial in the
26/11 case in Pakistan into further uncertainty, a judicial commission of that country, which was to record statements of key persons involved in Mumbai attack probe, failed to arrive
on its scheduled visit to India Thursday.
Islamabad conveyed to New Delhi through diplomatic
channels that the commission would not be able to come to
India on its planned visit as part of the judicial process in
the 26/11 case in Pakistan, government sources said.
Though no reason has been given for the cancellation of
the trip, the sources said it could be due to a special
hearing in the case on February 4 at a Rawalpindi court where
the trial is going on.
Pakistan has not suggested any fresh date for the visit
of the commission. India had earlier conveyed that the
commission could come anytime between February 1 and 10.
The commission was supposed to record the statement of
Ramesh Mahale, the 26/11 case investigating officer and R V
Sawant-Waghul, the magistrate who recorded the confessional
statement of lone surviving Pakistani gunman Ajmal Kasab. The
statements of two doctors who conducted the post-mortem of the
nine slain terrorists involved in the macabre attack along
with Kasab were also supposed to be recorded by it.
The visit of the commission has been pending for close to
two years and it has been delayed due to one reason or the
The trial in the Rawalpindi court also has been going on
at a snail`s pace and Indian officials are not very optimistic
that the guilty will be punished any time soon.
Curiously, four judges have been changed ever since the
trial began in early 2009. Shahid Rafique is the fifth judge
hearing the case.
Pakistan has already issued a gazette notification on the
formation of the judicial commission and has listed the names
of the members who will represent Pakistan government.
The delegation that was supposed to come includes Khalid
Qureshi, the head of the Federal Investigation Agency`s
Special Investigation Group, and Muhammad Azhar Chaudhry and
Chaudhry Zulifqar-- the two main prosecutors.
Five counsel of seven Pakistani suspects charged with
involvement in the Mumbai attacks had informed the
anti-terrorism court that they were prepared to go to India.
The commission was announced by Pakistan in response to a
directive from the anti-terrorism court that is conducting the
trial of seven Pakistani suspects, including Lashkar-e-Taiba
commander Zaki-ur Rehman Lakhvi, who have been charged with
planning and financing the attacks in 2008 that killed 166
The five lawyers include Lakhvi`s counsel Khwaja Sultan,
Riaz Cheema, Asam bin Haris and Fakhar-e-Hayat.
During the Home Secretary-level talks held in New Delhi
in March last year, India had agreed to the Pakistani proposal
to host the judicial commission of that country as Islamabad
maintained that it was necessary to send the panel to India as
part of the judicial process in Pakistan.
Pakistan`s contention is that the charges against seven
LeT operatives, including Lakhvi, lodged in a jail there, were
based on Kasab`s statement in Mumbai and, hence, it was
necessary to submit the magistrate`s and the IO`s statements
to the anti-terror court.
More from India
More from World
More from Sports
More from Entertaiment
- Is Akhilesh Yadav overlooking Muslims as Mulayam Singh alleged?
- DNA: Why did Navjot Singh Sidhu call BJP 'Kaikeyi’, Congress ‘Kaushalya’?
- 38-year-old arrested for ‘raping’ minors in Delhi; assaulted over 600 girls
- BJP announces 149 names in first list of candidates for UP elections
- My father wanted me to be a man of character: Navjot Singh Siddhu
- Geeta Phogat comes to rescue of Zaira Wasim; hits out at trolls, asks actress not to apologise
- ‘Dangal’ star Zaira Wasim says I am not a role model, not proud of what I am doing
- Assembly Elections: BJP releases list of 149 candidates for Uttar Pradesh, 64 for Uttarakhand
- Serial child rapist arrested in Delhi, says 'preyed on girls for sexual satisfaction, enjoyed it'
- China's NSG stand is neither fair nor transparent, says Defence Expert