90 per cent of people vote on caste lines: Katju
Zeenews
       English        
 Follow Me on Pinterest Google Plus Ditto RSS Mail to us Mail to us
Wednesday, May 22, 2013 
Search
Nation

90 per cent of people vote on caste lines: Katju

Last Updated: Monday, January 21, 2013, 21:07     A- A A+
Comments 2
New Delhi: 90 per cent of people vote on caste lines instead of assessing a candidate's merit, Press Council of India chief Markandey Katju on Monday said, claiming it allows people with criminal background to get elected.

"When they go to vote, 90 per cent of the people don't see the merit of the candidate but take a decision only on the basis of caste. And not only the illiterate, I am talking of the educated," he said.

Known to raise hackles with his often controversial remarks, the former Supreme Court Judge said it was not just the illiterate but the educated people who vote on caste lines and did not spare even his legal fraternity.

Recalling of his own experience in the high court, Katju said that even lawyers would vote on caste lines.

"I don't blame the uneducated, but am talking of the educated people. Professors of physics department, head of department....Would vote as per caste. How backward your country is," he said.

The PCI chairperson said that there were so many people of criminal background who get elected because people voted for them if they belonged to the same caste rather than going by merit.

Katju was speaking here at a function by organisation Vote for India, to mark the launching of national voter awareness week.

Katju said Democracy is a feature of industrial society and not a feature of feudal agricultural society.

"And till 1947 when India became independent, India was largely feudal," he said and added that the British policy had been to largely keep India unindustrialised.

He said that when the country got independence, the far sighted founding fathers adopted a Constitution based on a western model.

"The aim of the Constitution makers was to pull up society from its backwardness, from its feudalism and lift it up into the modern industrial age," he said.

He said that though this idea succeeded with industry coming up and the country progressing but midaway the feudal elements took over with the result that people voted on caste lines.

Deputy speaker of Lok Sabha Kariya Munda, who was also present, expressed unhappiness that a high percentage of the population including the educated people did not go out to vote.

"Many people think that what is the use of going to vote. If everyone thought like that, there would be no voting," he said.

He claimed that before 1990s people voted on the basis of party while later casteism and regionalism crept in.

"We see in parliament and have seen in assemblies that people start rolling up their sleeves and it seems they have entered a wrestling ring. This is not a good sign for democracy. Here a conclusion is arrived through discussion not through muscle power," Munda said.

"You may have seen that the minister is reading something and it is snatched and torn. Recently it happened in Parliament that the minister was reading a Bill when it was snatched.

"It is seen world over since it is telecast on TV and the impression among people is that after over 60 years of Independence, snatching happens not just in villages but also in Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabhas," Munda said.

He said that one of the reasons for this situation could be that the youth is not alert.

Munda said that it is important that everyone votes for the sake of the country and on the basis of merit of the candidates.

PTI

For Zee News’s Updates, follow us on Twitter , Facebook, Google+, Pinterest

First Published: Monday, January 21, 2013, 21:07

Post your Comments

Name:
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Comments

INDRAJEET DAS - NEW DELHI
THIS WAS NEVER NEW TO INDIAN DEMOCRACY THAT PEOPLE VOTE ON THE BASIS OF CASTE LINES AS THE LIBERAL LEADERS PROJECT ONLY THEIR OWN IN THE ELECTRORAL FILED FATHER SUPPORTING DAUGHTER , MOTHER SUPPORTING HER SON, THERE ARE SEVERAL INSTANCES SINCE 1947 THAT SUCH LEADERS ADVOCATE ONLY THEIR NEAR AND DEAR ONE THEREFORE WHY THE PEOPLE SHOULD BE BLAMED FOR SUPPORTING THEIR OWN LEADERS FROM THEIR OWN CASTE.IF ANY THING IS TO BE CHANGED IT HAS TO BE FROM THE TOP NOT FROM THE BOTTOM BECAUSE PEOPLE AT BOTTOM HAVE NOTHING TO GAIN BUT PEOPLE AT TOP HAVE EVERY THING TO GAIN. HOWEVER EVEN IN AMERICA PEOPLE VOTE BY THEIR ETHINICITY , OBAMA GOT NEARLY 85% OF BLACK VOTES BECAUSE HE IS BLACK , AND 75% VOTES FROM MINORITY COMMUNITY BECAUSE HE IS A MEMBER OF MINORITY COMMUNITY. OBAMA RE-ELECTION HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH HIS WORK OR HIS POLICIES.HE WON BECAUSE HE IS FROM A SPECIAL COMMUNITY , HE EVEN GOT THE VOTES FROM LIBERAL WHITE PEOPLE. BUT HAD WHITE AMERICAN VOTED IN RACIST LINES OBAMA WOULD HAVE LOST BUT WHITE AMERICANS DID NOT VOTE ON RACIEST LINES BUT BLACKS DID AND WILL ALWAYS DO SO IN THE END WHITES ARE THE LOSERS AND OBAMA WINNER. BOTTOM LINE IS POLITICS IS NEVER CHANGING DYNAMICS BE IT IS INDIA OR UNITED STATES OF AMERICA THEREFORE ONLY LOSERS DWELL UPON AND COMPLAIN THAT
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Petrus - Mumbai
Katju always omits important things. He refused to say that religious minorities too vote on religious lines and that this has lead to appeasement politics. He blames the Hindus only, because cateism is a Hindu charasteric. But then, all of the secularists do this. Only blame Hindus, never speak about the wrongs of the non-Hindus.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

View all Comments   

Most liked Comments

Top News



latest