`93 telecom scam: Sukh Ram moves SC
Zeenews
       English        
Tuesday, May 29, 2012 
Search
Follwo us on: Facebook Follwo us on: Twiter RSS Mail to us Mail to us Mail to us
Nation

'93 telecom scam: Sukh Ram moves SC

Last Updated: Wednesday, January 04, 2012, 20:04
Comments 1  
New Delhi: A day before he is to surrender to undergo three year jail term in a 1993 telecom scam, former Union Minister Sukh Ram on Wednesday moved the Supreme Court seeking stay on the Delhi High Court order which had upheld his conviction in the case.

The other two accused---former bureaucrat Runu Ghosh and P Rama Rao, the Managing Director of Hyderabad-based Advanced Radio Masts (ARM) Pvt Ltd--- have already moved the apex court for an immediate stay on the High Court order.

A bench of justices P Sathasivam and J Chelameswar will take up the petition of all the three persons tomorrow as one of the Supreme Court judges today recused himself from hearing the plea of Ghosh and Rao and directed that matter be listed before another judge.

The High Court had upheld the conviction and directed them to surrender before the trial court on January 5 to undergo three-year jail term for Sukh Ram, Rao and two-year imprisonment for Ghosh in the 1993 telecom equipment purchase deal to benefit the Hyderabad-based company.

The High Court had on December 21 last upheld the conviction of all the three accused and directed them to undergo jail term.

A Delhi court had convicted Sukh Ram politician and awarded him five years jail term in another telecom scam in which he had to spend 10 days in Tihar jail before being granted bail by another bench of the High Court.

PTI

First Published: Wednesday, January 04, 2012, 20:04

Comments

rupendra rakshit - yamunanagar
This cunning criminal has set his strategy to prolong the case till his death. He has already enjoyed the loot and the remaining amount will nows be enjoyed by his family members. It`s a shame for the nation that criminal are allowed to prolong the cases for decades after looting the nation. The courts at least could have confiscated his entire property and that of properties in the names of all immediate family members which should have been attached to the govt. treasury so tha the bastards are not allowed to flaunt the money power. Very disgusting.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

View all Comments   

Post your Comments

Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Most liked Comments