‘Acceptable to all Lokpal Bill within 3 months’
New Delhi: Chairman of the Standing Committee
on Lokpal Abhishek Singhvi on Monday said differences between Team
Anna and the government was not much on content but on the
methodology and promised to present an "acceptable to all" bill
within three months.
"You and I are together as far the objective and content
is concerned. The essence is similar if not identical and that
is fighting corruption. There could be relatively minor
differences in form.
"If the ways are a little different, it is because the
government is bound by a structure and Parliamentary process,"
Singhvi said when asked whether the Parliamentary panel could
end up incorporating the provisions of Jan Lokpal Bill when it
submits its final draft on Lokpal Bill to Parliament.
Noting that Parliamentary panels are given three months
initially to give their report and it is generally followed by
one or two extensions of three months each, Singhvi, however,
said the panel headed by him will give its recommendations
within three months.
"We will give recommendations on Lokpal Bill well before
the three-month period given to us," he said refusing to be
drawn into a debate on the deadline put by team Hazare.
"Competition in putting up conditions is not going to
solve the issue," he said.
Hazare`s associate Kiran Bedi, however, reacted sharply to
it saying "Singhvi had still not understood the fever. To see
the heat generated, they need to see it live."
Calling for "a little more reasonableness, restraint and
flexibility" from both sides, Singhvi said the Parliamentary
Standing Committees have the power make even up to 80 per cent
changes in the originally presented bill before it and that
"there should not be any doubt in anyone`s mind" about it.
If "suitable and appropriate" conditions are created, a
solution is possible, he stressed.
Singhvi said one must not think that the Standing
Committee will not consider the provisions of the Jan Lokpal
"I fail to understand why a reasonable solution could not
be found out," he said.
Asked whether the government can introduce another bill on
the same issue in Parliament without withdrawing the first,
Singhvi replied in negative.
"As far as private members` bills are concerned, there is
a separate process involved and that is between the member and
Lok Sabha Speaker or Rajya Sabha Chairman," he added.
More from India
More from World
More from Sports
More from Entertaiment
- Zee Media exclusive chat with 'Welcome to Karachi' cast
- Reservation issue: Police register case against Bainsla, 20 others
- Zee Media exclusive interview with Haryana CM Manohar Lal Khattar
- UP Minister allegedly threatens, abuses Gonda businessman
- Manali: Heavy corruption found in environmental taxes
- Aapke Sitare: Astro prediction for May 24, 2015
- Five unmanned parachutes spotted over Mumbai airport
- Watch: Fast N Facts @ 7:30pm
- UP: Jammu-bound Muri Express derails in Kaushambi
- One year of Modi govt: How satisfied is the common man?
- Jaipur girl Mini Rajpal wins Miss India Deaf 2015!
- Mumbai architecture creates double decker bus from scrap!
- One year of Modi govt: How satisfied is the common man? Part-2
- Dawood's intercepted phone calls prove yet again he is in Pakistan
- CBSE Board Class 12th Exam Results 2015 declared
- IPL 2015 Final: MI vs CSK - As it happened...
- Heatwave continues in North India; death toll in Andhra Pradesh, Telangana more than 400
- IPL 2015 final: Mumbai Indians thrash Chennai Super Kings by 41 runs to lift second title
- Heatwave claims over 550 lives so far, Delhi saw hottest day
- Check cbseresults.nic.in for CBSE Class 12 result 2015
- Kejriwal completes 100 days in office, AAP says centre 'shadow boxing' over row with LG
- Online filing of applications for UPSC civil services exam begins
- Not just today, Muslims feeling alienated since 1947: Najma Heptulla
- Mathura rally: PM Modi slams 'corrupt' UPA regime, lauds NDA govt's efforts in past one year
- CBSE Class 12 results out: Here's how you can check
- Pakistan criticizes Defence Minister Parrikar's terrorism remarks