Accused cannot be extradited on mere `Red Corner` notice: SC
In a ruling that would bring relief for Indian citizens facing criminal charges in foreign countries, the Supreme Court has held that an accused cannot be extradited on a mere "Red Corner" notice.
New Delhi: In a ruling that would bring
relief for Indian citizens facing criminal charges in foreign
countries, the Supreme Court has held that an accused cannot
be extradited on a mere "Red Corner" notice or on a warrant
issued by a foreign court, as the same has to conform to the
The apex court said a citizen can be extradited only if
there is a specific official request from the concerned nation
and the alleged offence is also an offence under any of the
Indian laws, otherwise it would be violative of the accused`s
fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 19 (freedom of
expression) and Article 21 (liberty) of the Constitution.
"The Act (Extradition) as also the treaties entered into
by and between India and foreign countries are admittedly
subject to our municipal law. Enforcement of a treaty is in
the hands of the Executive.
"But such enforcement must conform to the domestic law of
the country. Whenever, it is well known, a conflict arises
between a treaty and the domestic law or a municipal law, the
latter shall prevail," a Bench of justices SB Sinha and
Mukundakam Sharma said.
The apex court said the Extradition Act prescribes a
prior request from a foreign country.
"In the absence of any such request, no proceeding could
be initiated," the apex court said, while allowing the appeal
filed by Bhavesh Jayanti Lakhani in a matrimonial dispute.
Lakhani challenged the CBI`s decision to extradite him to
the US on the basis of a "Red Corner" notice issued by a
Magistrate Court, Clayton County, Georgia on a complaint filed
by his estranged wife Hetal G Thakker who accused him of
abducting their daughter and taking her to India.
Lakhani`s case was that there was no official request
from the US and the extradition proceedings were initiated on
the basis of a warrant issued by the foreign court.
The Bombay High Court had refused to stay the extradition
following which he appealed in the Supreme Court.
Upholding his plea, the apex court said, "Indisputably,
therefore, when a proceeding under the Act (Extradition) is
initiated, the civil liberty of a person would be directly
affected. The provisions of the Act, therefore, should be
strictly construed. Any request for extradition therefore must
undergo the strict scrutiny test.
"It furthermore stands admitted that matrimonial dispute
as such does not constitute an extraditable offence and, thus,
no effect could be given thereto. However, whether this case
concerns an extraditable offence or not has to be determined
by the Magistrate under the Act," the Bench said.