Ayodhya verdict: Another party to move SC
Zeenews
       English        
 Follow Me on Pinterest Google Plus Ditto RSS Mail to us Mail to us
Saturday, May 25, 2013 
Search
Nation

Ayodhya verdict: Another party to move SC

Last Updated: Monday, September 27, 2010, 16:02     A- A A+
Comments 6
Ayodhya verdict: Another party to move SC Lucknow: After petitioner Ramesh Chandra Tripathi, who had sought deferment of the Ayodhya verdict, another key party in the matter Nirmohi Akhara plans to move the Supreme Court for postponement of the judgment for three months to facilitate an out-of-court amicable settlement, a lawyer said Monday.

This was disclosed by Nirmohi Akhara counsel Ranjit Lal Verma here just before leaving for Delhi to move an application in the apex court.

"I am heading for Delhi to move an application before the apex court for postponing the verdict for three months," Lal said.

He is also seeking the apex court's intervention for granting extension to a judge of the Allahabad High Court, Dharam Veer Sharma, who is scheduled to retire at the end of the this month.

Justice Sharma is one of the three judges on the High Court bench which is due to deliver its judgment on the Ayodhya dispute. The High Court had reserved its verdict on July 27 and announced it would pronounce it on September 24.

The apex court later imposed an interim stay on the pronouncement of the judgment by the High Court till Tuesday. The apex court is now scheduled to take a final call on Tripathi's plea on Tuesday.

Retired bureaucrat Tripathi approached the apex court for postponing the HC verdict till at least the end of the October 3-14 Commonwealth Games. He also sought the court's direction to the parties to explore the possibility of an out-of-court amicable settlement.

He challenged the HC order rejecting his plea for deferring the pronouncement of the verdict so that there could be some mediation for an amicable settlement of the dispute.

Tripathi's petition was turned down by the three-judge special bench of the HC two weeks ago. While two judges SU Khan and Sudhir Agrawal rejected the application, the third judge, Dharam Veer Sharma, allowed the plea, following which Tripathi chose to move the apex court.

The High Court also imposed a fine of Rs 50,000 on Tripathi.

Nirmohi Akhara is a key party in the Babri Masjid-Ramjanmabhoomi title suit.

IANS

For Zee News’s Updates, follow us on Twitter , Facebook, Google+, Pinterest

First Published: Monday, September 27, 2010, 16:02

Post your Comments

Name:
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Comments

natarajan - Bangalore
central govt. don`t want this verdict ahead of cwg which may bring law & order problem in country which may effect cwg.. for them cwg is more important than ayodhya issue. so i don`t think verdict will come before cwg.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
PARTH - MUMBAI
some one is sitting in sc is anti indian supporting to ruling party as if verdict had happened condition of govt cought got worst
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
sudesh parashar - jaipur
according to me as soon as possible the result has declared and any how the result will declared on 28th sept. another this matter too far long away. becoz after that the new judges will come and they dont know the complete detail of this matter and they again see the whole matter and discurs with his collige. so i request that result will declared on tomorrow......jai shree ram
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Yunus Perwez - Abu Dhabi
as we knows superm court of india stay verdict babri masjid,ram janm bhumi till tuesday 28.9.10 i would like to mention supreme court should give direction to ayodhey verdict as possible as since 1949 this case is looking for justice it is one of the longest case in india.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
pokuri roshan - bhilai
if we go on postponing the judgement there will be no end for it it has been more than 17 years since the incident and if it is not now or it will be never tomorrow i may go to court and say that i want stay will the court listen to me and there is lot of mismanagement and fear among the people with this judgment and we can not live in such a condition for ever
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
ashok - mehsana
how can a third party like ramesh tripathi approach sc for deferment of ajudgement in which he is not a party.tommorrow pakistan will move sc by a proxy person in india for deferment of judgements against terrorists. then, will sc allow such petitions? if this happens any body will enter in any case in which he is not a party.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

View all Comments   

Most liked Comments

Top News



latest