Ayodhya: Waqf moves SC, says no compromise
Zeenews
       English        
Tuesday, May 29, 2012 
Search
Follwo us on: Facebook Follwo us on: Twiter RSS Mail to us Mail to us Mail to us
Nation

Ayodhya: Waqf moves SC, says no compromise

Last Updated: Tuesday, December 14, 2010, 13:59
Comments 11  
Ayodhya: Waqf moves SC, says no compromise Zeenews Bureau

New Delhi: The Sunni Central Waqf Board on Tuesday filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) in the Supreme Court challenging the Allahabad High Court verdict in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title suits and ruled out any compromise on the issue.

Elaborating on the Sunni Central Waqf Board’s latest move on the issue, senior advocate Zafaryab Jilani said, “Today we have moved a Special Leave Petition in the Supreme Court challenging the Allahabad High Court’s ruling in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title suits on various grounds.”

Jilani said that through the SLP, the Sunni Central Waqf Board has argued that the Allahabad High Court’s verdict is solely based its on a flight of faith rather than documentary evidence to show that Lord Ram was born exactly under the central dome of the masjid.

Jilani, who had earlier represented the Sunni Central Waqf Board in High Court, said, “We have also argued that the Allahabad High Court judgment violates the fundamental principles under Articles 25 and 26 — freedom to practice religion of choice. “

"Articles 25 and 26 give equal rights to all faiths. One faith cannot suffer at the expense of another,” the lawyer told reporters outside the premise of the Supreme Court.

Reacting to RSS chief Mohun Bhagwat’s latest comment on the verdict, Jilani said, “Now with the RSS expressing its displeasure over the judgement, which was more based of faiths rather than evidence, there seems to be no ground for a compromise on the issue.”

“AIMPLB has always maintained that any compromise formula can be considered if it respects the sentiments of Muslims and is in accordance to the Islamic Sharia Law,” Jilani pointed out.

The senior advocate also referred to the findings of the ASI, which never established that there was temple over the disputed land, which was demolished and a mosque erected by a Muslim ruler on it.

RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat, had earlier in the week, said, “The RSS opposes any division of Ramjanma bhoomi as it never solves the issue but deepens the crisis according to the history.”

Bhagwat said, “This (division) cannot be an option of division of Ramjanma bhoomi,” and reiterated the commitment to build Ram temple in Ayodhya.

First Published: Tuesday, December 14, 2010, 13:59

Comments

pradeep - UK
Ayodhya is birth place of Lord Ram not just because of the faith of crores of hindus, but also due to the historical evidence discovered through archeological survey. If faith is not one of the reasons to decide the birth place, how do muslims justify mecca as birth place of prophet mohemmad? If the Muslims don`t believe in the rule of law, then what else they want? Do they want hindus to surrender meakly? This will never happen....

From archeological survey concluded that there was a temple in Ayodhya and was demolished to build masjid, which is also upheld by court. Will they ever say sorry for wrong doings against hindus by their ancestor?
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Petrus -
In that case, Indian, it means that any piece of ground in Ayodhya can be considered Janmabhoomi. Thus, in the whole of Ayodhya, not a single inch of land can be allowed to build a mosque upon, since it could be the birthplace of the Lord.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
abrak - delhi
IN THIS SCIENTIFIC ERA , THERE IS NO PLACE FOR DOGMAS AND DREAMS . HOW CAN A JUDGE PIN POINT WHAT HAPPENED 1600000 YEAR BEFORE ?

EVEN TULSI DASS DID NOT MENTION ANY THING ABOUT A BIRTH PLACE
THERE WAS NO CIVILIZATION 1600000 YEARS BEFORE .
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Anshu - Hyderbad
These Muslims never understands Our feelings.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Indian - Chennai
It is not the matter of Babri Masjid any more, it stands for all Mosques, churches and individual properties of citizen of Nation if the court tells it will deliver judgement soley on belif of people then we don`t need any court to we need rule of all everyone is equal before ....If you claim set hindus belif that is birth place of Ram in the mean time understand that you have equal number hindus belif that is (Babri Masjid) is not the birth place of Ram .... In the same Ayodya you many place which are claimed and belived the birth place of Ram,It`s very highly imperitive to understand that saffron terrorism is taking over nation and rule of Law
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
naresh - hyderabad
who is that rascal who says that muslims are nuisance.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
subramani - India
Why Muslims throughout the world [of course not in the Muslim majority countries] behave the same.It seems they intend to create a situation so that the Govt`s.through out the world will expel them so that they can go to the WEALTHY ARABIAN countries such as Saudi Arabia,UAE etc
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
PROUD INDIAN - TAMIL NADU
muslims alway destroyed place of worship of other people.Sunnies destroy shia,ahmedia & sufi mosques.Today taliban (students of islam!)destroyed a sufi shrine in pakistan.What more evidence secularist (cong+communist+power broker journalists)need.the world cannot staisfy these jihadi muslims.we have to uproot this evil with the help of Israel.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
satendra - delhi
Mandir ya Masjid, ladte raho meri jaan..afterall, this is how, mera BHARAT mahan..
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Inustanis - Ladakh
Building Ram Temple at Ayodhya in Rama`s birth place is of urgent and no compromise in this. They(Wagaf) are remembering the past deeds and they waiting for people`s reaction in this. Thy have to give all the Temple whichnis captured by them. Apart from India where should it be built?? May be in Saudi or Iran or Pak, If you are naming a place there as Ayodhya we should build the temple there. Could You provide this?? If One`s birth place is so important , then could build Temple. No one could prevent these temples.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

View all Comments   

Post your Comments

Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Most liked Comments