Bhagat Singh a ‘Jat’, Rajguru ‘Brahmin’
Zeenews
       English        
 Follow Me on Pinterest Google Plus Ditto RSS Mail to us Mail to us
Friday, May 24, 2013 
Search
Nation

Bhagat Singh a ‘Jat’, Rajguru ‘Brahmin’

Last Updated: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 23:29     A- A A+
Comments 39
Bhagat Singh a ‘Jat’, Rajguru ‘Brahmin’ Zeenews Bureau

New Delhi: In what may snowball into a big political controversy, the Congress has described freedom fighters Bhagat Singh, Shivaram Hari Rajguru and Sukhdev Thapar by their caste affiliations in party mouthpiece ‘Sandesh’.

The references were made in an in-house advertisement marking the 81st Martyrdom Day published in the March edition published on March 23. Bhagat Singh has been described as a freedom fighter “born to a Jat Sikh family,” adding that he is “often” referred to as Shaheed Bhagat Singh.

Shivaram Hari Rajguru has been termed as “an Indian revolutionary from Maharashtra” who “belonged to Deshastha Brahmin community”.

And Sukhdev Thapar “as a (sic) freedom fighter who was involved with Shaheed Bhagat Singh and Rajguru in the killing of a British police officer J P Saunders in 1928 in order to take revenge for the death of veteran leader Lala Lajpat Rai due to excessive police beating”.

Expectedly, the BJP has criticised the Congress for insulting the nation’s heroes by referring to them by their caste. Bhagat Singh, Rajguru and Sukhdev have a standing that is not linked to their caste, the party opined.

Senior party leader Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi said, “Congress should apologise and explain its motive.”

However, Rajeev Shukla of the Congress defended the caste mention saying that a controversy should not be unnecessarily created over the issue as caste was mentioned only as a reference while writing their biography.

For Zee News’s Updates, follow us on Twitter , Facebook, Google+, Pinterest

First Published: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 23:29

Post your Comments

Name:
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Comments

fida hyder - hyderabad
i love india
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
sunny - New Zealand
congress party is made by English people, thats why we are still living like nonindependent, in our large country we are still looking for basic needs, politicians they are not changing laws like developed countries so they can eat more, we should put these basds in the jail and take over all of their properties. Vandey Matram, I love my India
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
ashwani - pathankot
they were real singh, means they fight like lion aginst british govt. but they are not singh like which named as a caste. means work is matter not name. the politician should also follow this and if they are real politician then in constitution abolition of title should come in amendement.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
ravi punia - meerut
i don know when people will get rid of the congress.congress supports casteism.the people should collect each other and remove it from the power .......jai hind
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
krishan - rewari
To mention caste is not an insult to freedom fighter.Reservation on the basis of caste is a stigma on the forheads of freedom fighter.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Rajiv Yadav - Patna
What is wrong? Caste is reality in India and part and parcel of daily life.

Every day we are reminded about our caste and religion. All the political parties allot ticket on the basis of caste equation.

Ostrich like mentality will not serve any purpose.

Grow up India.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Jayanth - Bangalore
By indicationally congress mentioned the caste of national hero`s. But caste is evergreen fact of Indian society. Before congress, some fundamental groups grabed that hero`s as them caste hero. It is not a new thing.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
harry - uk
Bunch of idiots,donn`t who us or congress?they are leaders of india most of the time,what have they given us corruption,population etc.Read wikileaks what RAHUL GANDHI think about this country and hindus,being hindu himself.Basically these politicians got no caste or religon,they got no balls take stnd aginst islamist radicals HAVE THEY
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
M.L.Gupta - New Delhi
And what is the caste of the writer of the article? Is it the same lot of ``historians`` that have been busy manufacturing history for their political masters. History is made not manufactured.There used to be times when such minds would dare not enter the Congress think tank, but now they control it and hence continue to manufacture history as exemplified by this wisecrack!
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
RAJAT KUMAR MOHINDRU - JALANDHAR CITY .PUNJAB
Why today it is the need to quote the caste of the mayters who have sacrificed there lives for the Independence of the nation . As Bhagat Singh , Rajguru , Sukdev when they laid down there lives for the Independence of India they had never thought in there minds about there religion , caste to which they belong . As today we are quoting there castes , What a strange ? The writer should have refrained from quoting the caste of these mayters as they should seek apologize for this incident .
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

View all Comments   

Most liked Comments

krishan - rewari
To mention caste is not an insult to freedom fighter.Reservation on the basis of caste is a stigma on the forheads of freedom fighter.



Top News



latest

West Bengal

Mamata violated model code, Congress tells poll panel


Read More »