CAG slams NDMA functioning, calls it `ineffective`
  • This Section
  • Latest
  • Web Wrap
Last Updated: Tuesday, April 23, 2013, 18:45
  
New Delhi: The National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) has drawn flak from the CAG which said the apex planning and supervising body in handling calamity has been found to be ineffective in most of the key areas.

In its performance audit report, the Comptroller and Auditor General of India said it has found that despite considerable progress in setting up institutions and creating funding arrangements, there are critical gaps in the preparedness level for various disasters.

"The NDMA, which was conceived as the apex planning and supervising body, was found ineffective in its functioning in most of the core areas.

"It neither had information and control over the progress of work at the state level nor was it successful in implementation of various projects," the CAG said in its report tabled in Parliament.

The auditor said coordination between NDMA and nodal ministries for various disasters need to be improved and roles and responsibilities amongst the apex bodies at the national level need to be clearly specified.

It said the system which came into effect in preparedness level for various disasters after the Disaster Management Act 2005 was yet to achieve its desired impact.

The CAG said the National Executive Committee had not met after May 2008, although the country faced many disasters since then and this had affected the evaluation of the disaster preparedness at all levels of government.

The CAG said the performance of NDMA in terms of project implementation had been abysmal. So far, no major project taken up by NDMA had seen completion.

"It was noticed that NDMA selected projects without proper ground work and as a result either the projects were abandoned midway or were incomplete after considerable period.

"In many cases, NDMA realised midway that some other agency was already executing projects with similar objectives," it said.

PTI


First Published: Tuesday, April 23, 2013, 18:45


comments powered by Disqus