CIC warns IIM-A against withholding information
Zeenews
       English        
Tuesday, May 29, 2012 
Search
Follwo us on: Facebook Follwo us on: Twiter RSS Mail to us Mail to us Mail to us
Nation

CIC warns IIM-A against withholding information

Last Updated: Thursday, September 17, 2009, 20:01
Comments 0  
New Delhi: The CIC on Thursday warned the premier management institute IIM-Ahmedabad of action under the RTI Act against its officials if any information is withheld from applicants without giving suitable reasons.

"The commission warned the Public Information Officer (PIO) that unless grounds for denial were based on Section 8(1) and proper reasons were given, no information should be withheld. Else it would invite penal provisions of Section 20 of the RTI Act," Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi mentioned in his order.

The Section 8(1) of the RTI lists various exemption clauses under which information can be withheld while Section 20 relates to the provisions of penalty if PIO is found guilty of not giving information to any RTI applicant.

Gandhi was hearing the plea of an IIM-A professor, TT Ram Mohan, who had sought the list of faculty members who availed "sabbatical leave" or "leave without pay" during last 10 years.

The PIO gave him some information but withheld the names of the faculty members who availed the leave, claiming the "third party" clause of the Act under which clearance from the person, whose "private" information is sought, is required before disclosure.

The names of the faculty members, who had availed sabbatical leave, were provided on the orders of the first appellate authority but names of two members were not disclosed as they objected to it.

The information received after this order showed that the PIO had given inaccurate information in his initial reply by not mentioning two faculty members, who had availed sabbatical leave under the "leave without pay" category. The PIO later claimed it was a clerical error.

Ram Mohan challenged the decision in the CIC claiming that the intention of the PIO was "malafide" in withholding the names of the two faculty members.

"He (PIO) has not revealed the two names on the grounds that the third parties had objected to it. This cannot be a ground for refusal and names of the people who take sabbatical leave cannot be treated as information that would cause unwarranted invasion on the privacy of the individual," Gandhi said.

The Information Commission ordered the IIM to provide letters of leave applications and the sanction orders for the last 10 years and also rejected the plea of clerical error warning the PIO to ensure that information supplied under the RTI Act is accurate.

Professor Mohan was denied the sabbatical leave when he sought it for writing the biography of Ravi Mathai, one of the initial directors of IIM-A, on the grounds that it was provided only in rare cases.

Bureau Report

First Published: Thursday, September 17, 2009, 20:01

Comments


View all Comments   

Post your Comments

Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Most liked Comments