Common test for science, engg on cards: Sibal
Zeenews
       English        
Tuesday, May 29, 2012 
Search
Follwo us on: Facebook Follwo us on: Twiter RSS Mail to us Mail to us Mail to us
Nation

Common test for science, engg on cards: Sibal

Last Updated: Wednesday, January 18, 2012, 22:33
Comments 7  
New Delhi: HRD Minister Kapil Sibal on Wednesday said a "resolution" on holding a common countrywide test for admission to undergraduate programmes in science and engineering is on the cards.

"We are heading towards a resolution on holding the common test," he told reporters after an extensive deliberation by ministry officials on the issue today.

Another round of meeting is expected before the proposal is put before the Central Advisory Board of Education for final approval.

Today's meeting is understood to have decided on a formula for preparing an all-India merit list based on the combined weightage given to class XII exam and to a common test. The test will examine a students logic and non-subject matters.

Sibal had earlier said that weightage would be given to the marks obtained in class XII boards after the results are equalised for which Indian Statistical Institute will put in place a mathematical formula for equalisation.

The IIT council and the NIT council have already given their nod to the test.

The government had constituted a committee under Secretary to the department of science and technology T Ramasami to examine implementation of a single entrance test. Six options were suggested for holding the test.

The single test, which is expected to be implemented during the 2013-14 academic session, is aimed at reducing the burden of students from appearing in multiple entrance tests.

PTI

First Published: Wednesday, January 18, 2012, 22:33

Comments

sumit - india
ab bhagwan hi bachaye india ke education system ko........the future is completely blind of indian educational system...after the ugly pattern of cce this move will definetely going to degrade the india`s finest institutes...bad move,really needed to be debated upon...
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
ARVIND GUPTA - SRI GANGANAGAR
aptitude test at this stage is a good option, but at board level uniformity and transperency must be confirmed. level of question paper at board level should also be improved.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
santosh tripathi - delhi
foreign universities must be setup in india .therefore mr sibal is doing all these things.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
s k tripathi - new delhi
mr sibal has lost his vision . he cannot see even the burden faced by students on implementing cce.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
MK SHARMA - MEERUT
I think Mr. Sibbal is not forseeing the future consequences of this step. Nobody is bothering about the quality reputation and stature of IITs. Everybody knows that getting 90 percent marks in a board exam is not a big deal these days. Aptitude is good thing to add but only aptitude is not at all required to be an engineer. Mr. sibbal and HRD have to think more in this step. This can harm Indias future in turn!!!
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
vicky - delhi
why not to have lottery system and make hrd minister responsible for conduction
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
sachin - delhi
its better to stop teaching Chemistry physics and math to student.......because extra burden on student..........................
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

View all Comments   

Post your Comments

Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Most liked Comments

sachin - delhi
its better to stop teaching Chemistry physics and math to student.......because extra burden on student..........................



santosh tripathi - delhi
foreign universities must be setup in india .therefore mr sibal is doing all these things.



ARVIND GUPTA - SRI GANGANAGAR
aptitude test at this stage is a good option, but at board level uniformity and transperency must be confirmed. level of question paper at board level should also be improved.