Curb discretion in judges` appointment: Jaitley
New Delhi: Disfavouring the idea of having pre-1993 supremacy of executive`s say in appointment of judges in higher judiciary, former Union law minister Arun
Jaitley wants restriction on their discretion in their appointing authority and having "comparable objective criteria" for judicial appointments.
He does not approve the idea of restoring the primacy of the executive in judicial appointments apprehending that political parties might be amenable to pressures from their acquaintances for appointment as judges.
Mooting the idea of having "comparable objective criteria" in judicial appointments, Jaitley told a news agency, "You need a legislative change which must now legislatively restrict the discretion of the appointing authority whether it
is collegium or a commission."
He was replying to a question if the pre-1993 primacy of executive in judicial appointment needs to be restored.
Referring to the absence of norms and regulations for the Supreme Court collegium to exercise its discretion in selecting judges for appointment in higher judiciary, Jaitley said, "You must introduce the criteria for appointment. Now it
is subjective. It should be changed to objective ones."
Advocating introduction of "comparable objective criteria" for appointment of judges, he said, "I (we) must find out what are the academic qualifications of all of you (candidate judges). How many cases have each one of you argued?
"How many of judgements that you`ve delivered, are reported in books and journals? How many articles have you published? How many juniors have you trained? Nothing is on record now. Unless criteria are introduced and they become
comparable objective criteria, the judges have become completely...
"It`s (the present appointment criteria) full of nepotism and therefore you have to go back (as) you can`t trust their discretions. You must now regulate judicial
discretions in matter of appointments."
Jaitley said his new ideas on judicial appointments have been evolved over and above the provisions of the 2003 bill that he had introduced in Parliament for constitution of National Judicial Commission (NJC) for judicial appointment
and having disciplinary jurisdiction over higher judiciary judges.
He said the idea of regulating discretions in matter of judicial appointment has also the backing of former Chief Justice of India JS Verma.
More from India
More from World
More from Sports
More from Entertaiment
- Missed the dance of American President Donald Trump? - Watch it here
- Pawan, a BE student develops smart dustbin -Watch
- DNA: Manish Sisodia faces CBI probe over alleged irregularities in 'Talk To AK' programme
- Barack Obama thanks Americans for making him a 'better man'
- Is there no respect for Congress in UP politics?
- Accused of Muslim-bias on visa applications, Sushma Swaraj hits back
- Cuttack ODI: Umpire Kumar Dharmasena messes up DRS review, twitter couldn't stop trolling
- Donald Trump's Inauguration Day: As it happened
- Yuvraj Singh's wife Hazel Keech suggests new middle name for hubby Yuvi following Cuttack heroics
- Virat Kohli vs Sachin Tendulkar: Who is a better cricketer? Read what Virender Sehwag has to say