SC prevents Nandy`s arrest, advises him to speak carefully
Zeenews
       English        
 Follow Me on Pinterest Google Plus Ditto RSS Mail to us Mail to us
Saturday, May 25, 2013 
Search
Nation

SC prevents Nandy's arrest, advises him to speak carefully

Last Updated: Friday, February 01, 2013, 20:56     A- A A+
Comments 5
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday restrained Rajasthan Police from arresting sociologist Ashis Nandy against whom FIRs have been filed for making uncharitable comments about Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes but asked him to be careful in his statements.

A bench of Chief Justice Altamas Kabir, Justice Anil R Dave and Justice Vikramajit Sen also issued notice to the central and Rajasthan, Maharashtra, Chhattisgarh and Bihar governments on Nandy's petition seeking to restrain any action on the spate of FIRs filed against him. The notice is returnable in four weeks.

Staying his arrest, the court, however, said that Nandy had no licence to make statements that hurt others.

"Advise your client that he has no right to make such comments," Chief Justice Kabir told counsel Aman Lekhi appearing for Nandy.

Told that Nandy did not intend to denigrate any section of society, the court said: "Forget about intentions, and be careful."

When Lekhi asked if law could penalise an idea, Chief Justice Kabir snapped back: "Yes, why not. When it (an idea) is not in public interest."

Asked whether Nandy was supporting the idea articulated by him, he said: "It is not a question of an idea but the way it is said."

"Each person has his ideas, but it should not disturb others. In the context of an idea, you can't go on making such remarks," Chief Justice Kabir said, adding that statements have to be made "in a responsible manner".

The FIRs were filed after Nandy, speaking at a panel discussion at the Jaipur Literary Festival on January 26, contended that "corruption" was a leveller in India, and that long-deprived sections of society were turning to it too in a bid to wrest power and wealth forcibly from an established elite.

As Lekhi contended what has been attributed to Nandy was an idea not intended to denigrate any particular section of the society, the Chief Justice pointed to an advocate, from a weaker section of society, seeking permission to assist the court as he was aggrieved by Nandy's comments. This advocate was asked to file his application and the court would consider it.

Lekhi came in for some drubbing from the court when he submitted that a "hysteria is being created".

Not pleased with the submission, the court asked him: "Who is saying it? Don't say it."

"Has your client asked you to say it? Why are you saying it," the court asked.

To buttress his plea, Lekhi said that in a mature democracy there has to be some space for contrary views.

The counsel said that under the law that was only one FIR of an incident, but in this case FIRs have been filed in several places including Jaipur, Nashik, Raipur and Patna, adding that in one instance, a sedition case has been booked against Nandy.

Nandy had moved the apex court seeking quashing of a FIR against him by the Rajasthan government for making some controversial remarks against the marginalized sections of the society at the just concluded Jaipur literary festival.

Nandy, who has been charged with an offence attracting punishment for criminal intimidation and Section 3(1)(x) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, has urged the court to issue necessary guidelines to ascertain what constitute an offence under the latter provision.

He has also sought guidelines by the apex court so this provision could not be "misused to hamper freedom of speech and expression and also to set out the circumstances in which alone the police officials may investigate and initiate penal action under the said Act".

The offence under Section 3(1)(x) is non-bailable and even anticipatory bail is denied under Section 18 of the act, the petition said.

Nandy has contended that the registration of the FIR by Rajasthan Police was "an abuse of law" and he was denied his fundamental rights under Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution, because of the clamour for his immediate arrest from important political personalities including Bahujan Samaj Party chief Mayawati and SC/ST chairman PL Punia.

IANS

For Zee News’s Updates, follow us on Twitter , Facebook, Google+, Pinterest

First Published: Friday, February 01, 2013, 08:55

Post your Comments

Name:
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Comments

Communal Award - Tokyo
BRAHMIN people are afraid to take their Caste share of land and build their own nation as per 4th August 1932 Round Table Conference Resolution (Communal Award).
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Adithya - Chennai
If you really have a look at Nandy`s statement, it is very clear that he did not intend to hurt aanybody and it was said in any very different context than what is being portrayed. the Supreme court is an institution which is supposed to consider whether lawfully a person has made a mistake or not. Who are they to give advises on what I should say and what I should not. According to our own constitution we have the right to freedom of speech as long as it satisfies certain criteria. And it`s very obvious that Nandy had not meant anything hurtful which is accepted by the Supreme court. They`d do better if they restrain themselves from saying ``Look, this might be hurtful for so and so persons if you look at it this way, so please don`t say that in public.``It would be impossible for anyone to say anything if that is the case.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
D.N.MAKHIJA - DELHI........INDIA
IT IS NOT GOOD TO SPEAK SUCH WORDS WHICH HURT THE FEELINGS OF OTHER MAY BE FROM ANY COMMUNITY........IT IS ALSO NOT GOOD TO MAKE IT SUCH A ISSUE TO INVOLVE POLICE AND HON. COURT WHICH DISTURB THE PEACE OF THE COUNTRY.........THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO USE CHEAP LANGUAGE FOR OUR PM..RAHUL,SONIA GANDHI AND ETC. AND THEY DO NOT INVOLVE POLICE AND HON. COURT FOR THE CHEAP REMARKS...........WE WASTE OUR ENERGY TO UNPRODUCTIVE ISSUES..
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
veer - pune
do hell with right or wrong the question is whether a person has a freedom of expression or not in this self proclaimed great country which had sucked from centuries and when things like this happen to a well known socialist it sucks even more i wonder what would happen when a mango person says something like this his life will be ruined and we just celebrated republic day this is the republic of india what a hypocrite country india is.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Vittalanand - Chennai
This is a nation where expression of private views are free so long as they do not infringe private lives of induviduals. Dalits had not jumped from heaveven and are not Gods. There is every right to every body to express peronal opinion. I do not find any reason for Nandy`s comments to be illegal for registering FIR. Any body having full knowledge on Law in this regard may kindly cite reasons under which he is chargeable with a FIR for experessing peronal opinion. Even Mahatma Gandhiji has not been spared by critics from adverse comments.Howe far Nandy`s comments are cognizable and filing of FIR under criminal charges is considered not proper. Let us wait what the Supreme court says on this issue.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

View all Comments   

Most liked Comments

veer - pune
do hell with right or wrong the question is whether a person has a freedom of expression or not in this self proclaimed great country which had sucked from centuries and when things like this happen to a well known socialist it sucks even more i wonder what would happen when a mango person says something like this his life will be ruined and we just celebrated republic day this is the republic of india what a hypocrite country india is.



D.N.MAKHIJA - DELHI........INDIA
IT IS NOT GOOD TO SPEAK SUCH WORDS WHICH HURT THE FEELINGS OF OTHER MAY BE FROM ANY COMMUNITY........IT IS ALSO NOT GOOD TO MAKE IT SUCH A ISSUE TO INVOLVE POLICE AND HON. COURT WHICH DISTURB THE PEACE OF THE COUNTRY.........THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO USE CHEAP LANGUAGE FOR OUR PM..RAHUL,SONIA GANDHI AND ETC. AND THEY DO NOT INVOLVE POLICE AND HON. COURT FOR THE CHEAP REMARKS...........WE WASTE OUR ENERGY TO UNPRODUCTIVE ISSUES..



Vittalanand - Chennai
This is a nation where expression of private views are free so long as they do not infringe private lives of induviduals. Dalits had not jumped from heaveven and are not Gods. There is every right to every body to express peronal opinion. I do not find any reason for Nandy`s comments to be illegal for registering FIR. Any body having full knowledge on Law in this regard may kindly cite reasons under which he is chargeable with a FIR for experessing peronal opinion. Even Mahatma Gandhiji has not been spared by critics from adverse comments.Howe far Nandy`s comments are cognizable and filing of FIR under criminal charges is considered not proper. Let us wait what the Supreme court says on this issue.



Top News



latest

Nation

Aarushi murder case: Talwars move SC for summoning witnesses


Read More »