EC disfavours Team Anna`s electoral proposals
Zeenews
       English        
Tuesday, May 29, 2012 
Search
Follwo us on: Facebook Follwo us on: Twiter RSS Mail to us Mail to us Mail to us
Nation

EC disfavours Team Anna's electoral proposals

Last Updated: Tuesday, November 01, 2011, 19:19
Comments 4  
New Delhi: The Election Commission has virtually disfavoured Team Anna's electoral reform proposals saying its demand for 'Right to Recall' will bring instability while 'Right to Reject' will lead to more frequent elections.

This was conveyed to Team Anna members led by Shanti Bhushan on Monday when they met Chief Election Commissioner S Y Quraishi and other members V S Sampath and H S Brahma to discuss electoral reforms.

Hazare had announced in August when he called off his fast for a strong Lokpal that his next fight will be for implementing 'Right to Recall' and 'Right to Reject'.

During the discussions, an official statement said, Quraishi told the delegation that Right to Recall elected representatives would "bring instability" as the losers could start such a campaign from day one.

On Right to Reject, the Commission was of the view that an amendment was needed in the Representation of the People Act 1951, a view countered by Team Anna which claims that it can be done through an administrative order.

The statement comes in the wake of claims reportedly made by activist Arvind Kejriwal that the Commission had accepted their demand for making changes in rules to provide for 'Right to Reject' option during elections.

Quraishi told Team Anna that when implemented, 'Right to Recall would also hamper development activities because of "frequent elections" and imposition of Model Code of Conduct too often.

He said there were various implications involved like the minimum percentage of voters who may file the petition for recall, verification of authenticity of thousands of signatures and whether those signatures have been given voluntarily or under coercion.

Team Anna agreed that the matter needed to be further examined by them keeping all the above implications in mind.

On the demand for 'Right to Reject', the statement said the Commission informed the delegation that it had already proposed to the Government in December 2001 to make a suitable provision in the rules to introduce a button in the balloting unit of the Electronic Voting Machine so that electors could exercise 'none of the above' option.

PTI

First Published: Tuesday, November 01, 2011, 19:19

Comments

INDIAN - INDIA
RIGHT TO RECALL AND RIGHT TO REJECT ARE THE RIGHT AND LEFT ARMS OF THE JAN LOKPAL BILL. RIGHT TO RECALL AND RIGHT TO REJECT WILL MAKE THE JAN LOKPAL BILL VERY STRONG AND ACTIVE.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Virat - India
It is not for the election commission to decide if right to recall is good or bad. It s the people who WILL decide and they better follow up. We know the the loser can start the campaign from day one , that`s one the moron who made it to the Parliament have to start performing from day 1.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
ashok ahluwalia - Bawarna himachal pradesh
EC is very much right when it says that right to recall is not posiible. In a country like India where there are elction every month in some or the other form it is not suitable. The right to reject is more practical and there must be a button None Of The Above
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
nikhil - dubai
THE RIGHT TO RECALL A MEMBER ELECTED TO THE LOK SABHA OR RAJYA SABHA ONE SHOULD ALSO THINK ABOUT THAT WE HAVE A SYSTEM OF PARTY BASED ELECTIONS, AND IN CASE A MEMBER ELECTED ON A PARTICULAR PARTY TICKET IF FOUND UNSUITABLE IN CONDUCT OF HIS/HER DUTIES THAN THE MATTER BE REFERRED TO THAT PARTY AND ITS ORGANISATION WHO IN TURN CAN PUT A REPLACEMENT CANDIDATE WITHOUT FRESH ELECTIONS TILL THE TENOR OF THAT ELECTION SAY FIVE YEARS THIS WAY, WE CAN AVOID FREQUENT ELECTIONS TO FILL UP THAT SEAT IN OTHER WORDS IN OTHER WORDS THE RIGHT TO RECALL.DURING A TERMS SHOULD BE GIVEN TO THE PARTY HE/ HER BELONGS. THE SAME PARAMETER SHOULD BE FOR CIRCUMSTANCES THAT A MEMBER HAS DIED DURING HI/HER TENOR BE ALSO GIVEN TO THAT PARTY. ELECTIONS SHOULD ONLY TAKE PLACE EVERY FIVE YEARS OR THE GOVT RESIGNS OR IS DEFEATED IN MOTION IN PARLIAMENT.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

View all Comments   

Post your Comments

Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Most liked Comments

Virat - India
It is not for the election commission to decide if right to recall is good or bad. It s the people who WILL decide and they better follow up. We know the the loser can start the campaign from day one , that`s one the moron who made it to the Parliament have to start performing from day 1.



ashok ahluwalia - Bawarna himachal pradesh
EC is very much right when it says that right to recall is not posiible. In a country like India where there are elction every month in some or the other form it is not suitable. The right to reject is more practical and there must be a button None Of The Above