Explain delay in Bhullar`s mercy plea: SC to govt
The SC asked the Centre to explain a delay of over eight years in deciding the mercy plea of terrorist Devender Pal Singh Bhullar.
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday asked the
Centre to explain a delay of over eight years in deciding the
mercy plea of terrorist Devender Pal Singh Bhullar, who was
awarded death penalty for triggering a bomb blast here in
September 1993 killing nine people.
A bench headed by Justice GS Singhvi asked the Centre to
file an affidavit by October 10, explaining the delay in
deciding Bhullar`s mercy plea of 2003, rejected by President
"Everybody is anxious to know what happened during these
eight years. What happened between 2003 and 2011?" the court
said while asking the government to file its response.
Bhullar was sentenced to death by a TADA court on August
25, 2001 for his role in the September 10, 1993 bomb blast in
Delhi targeting the cavalcade of then Youth Congress President
Maninderjit Singh Bitta who escaped with serious injuries,
though nine security personnel were killed.
The Supreme Court had on March 26, 2002 dismissed
Bhullar`s appeal against the death sentence.
He had then filed a review petition which was also
dismissed on December 17, 2002. Bhullar then moved a curative
petition which too was dismissed by the apex court on March
12, 2003. Bhullar, meanwhile, had filed a mercy petition
before the President on January 14, 2003.
The President, after a lapse of over eight years,
dismissed his mercy plea on May 25 this year.
Bhullar is currently undergoing treatment at the
Institute of Human Behaviour and Allied Sciences (IHBAS) in
Shahdara for hypertension, psychiatric illness and suicidal
In a petition to the apex court, his wife Navneet Kaur
has contended that the May 25 order of the President ought to
be quashed as "the same suffers from lack of application of
mind, non-consideration of relevant circumstances and
presumably having been made on extraneous grounds."
She has also pleaded for altering his death penalty to
life term saying it would be "inhuman and violative of Article
21 of the Constitution" to carry out his execution.
Kaur claimed that Bhullar has turned "mentally retarded"
due to delay of more than 5,700 days in deciding his mercy
plea. She claimed the last time she met him at IHBAS, she
found him to be quiet, withdrawn and unwilling to talk.
"His condition has continued to deteriorate since his
conviction in 2003. Earlier, she thought he was only suffering
from hypertension and arthritis but now she realises the
psychotic symptoms with suicidal tendencies are a by-product
of suffering a slow death on account of being a condemned
prisoner since 2001.
"Execution of a mentally retarded prisoner is considered
to be cruel and inhuman and should be deemed to be prohibited
under Article 21 of Constitution of India. In the US, there is
a national consensus that mentally retarded persons are
excluded from execution because it can neither serve as a
retribution nor deterrence," said the petition.
Kaur cited the apex court`s ruling in the Triveniben Vs
State of Gujarat (1989) case that undue delay in execution of
death sentence entitles the condemned prisoner under Article
32 of the Constitution to approach court that his death
sentence be commuted to life imprisonment.