Justice Verma panel moots tough laws, no death for rapists
Zeenews
       English        
 Follow Me on Pinterest Google Plus Ditto RSS Mail to us Mail to us
Saturday, May 25, 2013 
Search
Nation

Justice Verma panel moots tough laws, no death for rapists

Last Updated: Thursday, January 24, 2013, 09:02     A- A A+
Comments 73
Justice Verma panel moots tough laws, no death for rapists New Delhi: Making far reaching recommendations, the Justice Verma Committee on Wednesday favoured comprehensive amendments to criminal laws seeking minimum 20 years imprisonment for gang rape and life term for rape and murder but refrained from prescribing death penalty.

However, the three-member Committee headed by former Chief Justice JS Verma, which was constituted in the wake of the nationwide outrage over the December 16 gang rape of a girl in Delhi, is not in favour of reducing the age of juveniles under the law.

Nor did the Committee favour chemical castration of rapists saying the Constitution of India does not permit mutilation of a human body.

In its 630-page report to the government submitted today, the Committee has suggested amendment of criminal laws to provide for higher punishment to rapists, including those belonging to police and public servants.

New offences have been created and stiffer punishment has been suggested for those committing rape and leaving the victim in a vegetative state. They include disrobing a woman, voyeurism, stalking and trafficking.

Sexual misconduct also includes intentional touching, spoken words and gestures made as advances.

The present law provides for punishment of rapists imprisonment ranging from seven years to life in jail. For the first time, the minimum punishment is sought to be raised to 20 years in some cases.

The panel's view on juvenile's age assumed significance in the context of strong demands for lowering the age from 18 to 16 against the backdrop of the allegation that one of the six accused is said to be a juvenile.

The Committee, comprising a former High Court Chief Justice Leila Seth and jurist Gopal Subramanium, also traversed various areas in a bid to check crimes against women seeking disqualification of MPs and MLAs charged with heinous crimes like rape, measures to check khap panchayats and trial of personnel of security forces under ordinary criminal laws and not under AFSPA.

Addressing a press conference, Justice Verma came down heavily on Union Home Secretary R K Singh for praising Delhi Police Commissioner after the Delhi gang rape instead of coming out with an apology.

It also attacked police for the lathicharge on young demonstrators in the capital last month which it said had scarred democracy.

Releasing the report, Justice Verma told a news conference that the Committee has not suggested death penalty for rapist because there was overwhelming suggestions from the women organisations against it, a point that was received with thunderous applause from activists at the media interaction.

The Committee did not recommend death penalty for rape because it was a "regressive step" and it "may not have a deterrent effect".

"We have not recommended death penalty as we had overwhelming suggestions against it. The women groups unanimously were against death penalty and that is why we thought that is a strong reason to respect that view particularly in view of the modern trend also," Justice Verma said.

Even while it recommended amendments to various laws and enhancement of punishment, the panel concluded that existing laws if faithfully and efficiently implemented by credible law enforcement agencies or sufficient to protect the safety and dignity of people particularly of women and punish offenders.

"This is not to suggest that the necessary improvements in law, keeping in mind modern times, should not be enacted at the earliest," it said.

The Committee also said speedy justice was necessary for right to life with dignity and recommended that systemic changes could reduce burden of arrears in courts. The judge strength can be increased in phases while retired eminent retired judges could be appointed on adhoc basis.

Among the amendments proposed is a change in Section 100 of the IPC dealing with right of private defence which extends to causing death.

Taking note of the brutality committed in the Delhi gang rape incident, the Committee suggested replacement of Section 375 defining rape by defining specific unnatural acts.

Intentional touching will constitute the offence of sexual assault for which punishment will be a maximum of five years rigorous imprisonment or fine or both.

Use of words, gestures which create an unwelcome threat of sexual nature or advance would invite a maximum punishment of one year imprisonment or fine or both.

Causing grievous hurt through use of acid on women shall also be punished with rigorous imprisonment for not less than 10 years but could go upto life.

The Committee said the Delhi gang rape incident has disclosed the failure of many public functionaries responsible for traffic regulation, maintenance of law and order and more importantly, their low and skewed priority of dealing with complaints of sexual assault.

Disputes relating to the jurisdiction of the police over the area of the crime are often a cause of delay in initiating the process of taking cognisance of the crime and providing medical aid to the victim.

The panel said the peculiarity of the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi not having any control over the police force, which control vests only in the Ministry of Home Affairs is the reason given publicly by the Delhi Chief Minister for the absence of responsibility of her government.

"This ambiguity must be removed forthwith so that there is no divided responsibility in Delhi in respect of maintenance of law and order. Such a step is also essential to maintain accountability," it said.

The Committee also took note of the apathy of civil society and mentioned about the inaction of passers-by and bystanders, who failed in their citizenship duty of rendering help to the Delhi gang rape victim and her companion who were lying badly injured and disrobed on the roadside for a considerable amount of time.

"Misbehaviour of the police towards any samaritan is often the cause for such apathy. But this must not deter citizens from doing their duty. A change in the behaviour of the citizenry will also improve the conduct of the police. This effort must be promoted," it said.

PTI

For Zee News’s Updates, follow us on Twitter , Facebook, Google+, Pinterest

First Published: Wednesday, January 23, 2013, 09:43

Post your Comments

Name:
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Comments

Ken - France
We could not expect better from indian justice system.They cannot give death sentence coz sooner or later some MLA`s friend or relative will be in similar situation,so better save them in advance.As per indian judicial system victims are treated like criminals and criminal become VIP`s.Its better not to have judicial system in India.Better set them free and let all criminals walk free,All the 5 accused were equally involved ,SO BEST WILL BE TO LET GO ALL OF THEM< NOT ONLY BECAUSE ONE IS JUVENILE.This is a pretexte and escape justice.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Vishnu VG - Trivandrum
It seems the juvenile gets more protection as per this report. The report is a total failure as it denied public opinion on hanging and even wasted others time by collecting opinions. Please try understand a bit the sufferings of those victims and their families and make a reasonable report.. Rapists should be hanged, if its proved.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Anumika - Delhi
NO death penalty to rapists..!! Juvenile age not reduced to 16, Just a solitary confinement of 20 years..!...Huh..Why just a normal jail life, provide them with a T.V, radio set, fridge, wifi connection, a laptop too.. Coz expecting anything out from the Indian Law and government is like living in a fool`s paradise..!
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Mohan Lal - New Delhi
I do not understand the logic of Justice Verma`s report favoring not handing down death penalty (and specially to the so called ``juvenile`` or ``minor`` who inflicted un-imaginable painful injuries to the brave-heart girl, in fact, he should be hanged first and qualifying age should be reduced to 16 years) to the six persons who committed monstrous crime upon the innocent young girl. While appreciating Justice Verma`s report in general, I would say his report is not an ultimate gospel or un-removable line on stone. If the government has the will, it should definitely ignore this recommendation of not giving death sentence to all the 6 perpetrators of the crime. What about the victim`s wish (to hang all six criminals) as well as of their sentiments and that of his parents and relative besides public as a whole who will get peace only if all the six are hanged as soon as possible. What purpose will be served to keep these brutes alive for whole life in jail, rather this will be an un-necessary burden on the State’s exchequer. The best would be to eliminate them at the earliest so that there is an element of deterrence (no matter how small it may be) for others against not committing such heinous crimes. All 6 should be surgically castrated and not chemically.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
SHANKAR - BENGALURU
JUSTICE VERMA`S RECOMMENDATION WILL OFFEND PEOPLE`S SENSIBILITIES. THE RAPE VICTIM AND PARENTS OF THE VICTIM MUST NOT TAKE COURSE TO LAW AS IT IS AN ASS AND DELAY IN DELIVERING JUSTICE WILL NEGATE THE JUSTICE SYSTEM. jUNGLE RAJ IS THE RIGHT ANSWER. iN DEMOCRACY where THE RULING PARTY IS BOTHERED ABOUT ITSELF AND ITS CRONIES. dAMN THE AAM AADMI IN A MANGO REPUBLIC.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
rajiv pathak - new delhi
a person should be hanged till death not in jail but in open market or some famouse public place so that every person get some massageof stopping rape case.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
mala bhattacharjee - noida
i donot understand why Justice Verma wasted so much time to make such useless recommendations. let him get his wife and daughter raped and then he will understand what should be the punishment of a rapist How come an 18 year old boy who could do such aheinous crime cold bloodedly be a minor and escape punishment..Either the Judge is mentally retarded or the criminalis. Only death penalty within amonth of theheinous crime like rape can be an answer.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
mala bhattacharjee - noida
i donot understand why Justice Verma wasted so much time to make such useless recommendations. let him get his wife and daughter raped and then he will understand what should be the punishment of a rapist How come an 18 year old boy who could do such aheinous crime cold bloodedly be a minor and escape punishment..Either the Judge is mentally retarded or the criminalis. Only death penalty within amonth of theheinous crime like rape can be an answer.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Indian - India
I just do not understand the basis on which Verma made these recommendations. It is unfortunate that a Chief Justice has made these recommendations. Clearly shows how brainless Indians can be. If someone is murdered then laws of murder should apply, why the heck would you invent an entirely new category named ``rape and murder``. That is ridiculous. The juvenile age-limit of 18 is also incomprehensible. If a female can marry at the age of 18 then how can a male be termed juvenile at the same age. In the 630-page report that Verma claims to have drafted I believe he wasted 95% of the pages criticizing the goverment rather than recommending an effective law. I wish that 70+ Verma be taken to Jantar-Mantar and his ``dick`` be made Choo-Mantar. That is when he will perhaps realize what it means to be raped.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
manisha sakhare - mumbai
i think our law is taking more effort to protect rapists, and it is clear to see that it is much weeker to protect the women respect so is time to make our self strong n responsibile that you can protect you self by ur self only only one thing we should ask to our law n system is the law for the people or for the protecting giving safe helmate to wrong doer.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

View all Comments   

Most liked Comments

Ken - France
Is it a fast track justice?What is slow track then?Still deciding?How funny are the systems of India?Juvenile or Adult?Whether to punish or not?Rigolo.



Rahi - Ahmedabad
What lame judiciary we have? Nothing changed and status quo maintained? Why don`t they let their daughters and wives be raped first and then see if the current system is sufficient?



D.N.MAKHIJA - DELHI............INDIA
WE GIVE VIP TREATMENT TO HEINOUS CRIMINALS AND SPEND LOTS OF MONEY ON THEIR SECURITY AS THEY ARE OUR FAMILY MEMBERS...........MR.RAHI FROM AHMEDABAD IS CORRECT....



Top News



latest

Delhi

Woman gang-raped in Delhi


Read More »