close
This ad will auto close in 10 seconds

Former CJI defends verdict in Bhopal case

Former Supreme Court Chief Justice A H Ahmadi Tuesday rejected criticism of dilution of charge against Union Carbide executives in Bhopal gas tragedy case, saying in criminal law there was no concept of vicarious liability.



New Delhi: Former Supreme Court Chief
Justice A H Ahmadi Tuesday rejected criticism of dilution of
charge against Union Carbide executives in Bhopal gas tragedy
case, saying in criminal law there was no concept of vicarious
liability.

He also lamented that there was absence of law to deal
with disasters of Bhopal kind and said law can be amended to
provide for adequate punishment.

Justice Ahmadi, who headed the bench in 1996 that
converted the CBI charge under the stringent provisions of
304-II that provided for maximum of 10 years imprisonment to
Section with two years maximum imprisonment, said it was easy
for people to talk and make allegations but judges have to
work under the system.

"One has to work within the system, within the
framework of law. It is easy to speak today, to swing with the
tide," he said reacting to criticism that the decision given
by bench had led to light punishment given by a Bhopal court
in the gas case yesterday.

"There is no concept of vicarious liability. If my
driver is driving and meets with a fatal accident, I don`t
become liable to be prosecuted under 304-II," he said.

Justice Ahmadi said that there was no vicarious
liability concept in criminal law except that "if there is an
abetment, the abettor may be joined with the principal
offender. If there is a common intention situation or
conspiracy situation, that is understandable. Otherwise no."

PTI

From Zee News

0 Comment - Join the Discussions

trending

photo gallery

video

DNA EXCLUSIVES

Narendra Modi's fear made Dawood change hideouts four times since 2014, reveals Iqbal Kaskar

The US-N Korea stand-off revives nuclear holocaust fears

DNA Edit: GDP growth pangs

The fault lines in our society

DNA Edit: Myths and epics must not outweigh scientific temper