HC fixes Jan 28 to hear review petitions on Ayodhya title suit
Lucknow: The Allahabad High Court on Friday fixed January 28 as the next date of hearing on the three review petitions on the Ayodhya title suits judgment while
extending the status quo on the September 30 verdict`s implementation till February 15.
The special Lucknow bench of the court comprising justices SU Khan, Sudhir Agarwal and VK Dixit passed the order while hearing the review petitions filed by lawyer M
The court also extended the status quo on the implementation of the September 30 order upto February 15.
The court had provided three months time for filing the appeal while directing that the judgment shall not be operative for three months from that date.
Farooqui had moved petitions seeking review in the judgment on the suits of Rajendra Singh, Nirmohi Akhara and Bhagwan Ram Lala Virajman.
Meanwhile, the court also reserved its order on the objections filed by the Hindu Mahasabha, a party in the case, in connection with finalising the decree after hearing the
arguments of the counsel of the party.
On September 30, a three-judge Lucknow bench of the court had held that the 2.77 acre disputed land in Ayodhya be divided into three parts among Hindus and Muslims. It had
ruled that the place where the makeshift temple of Lord Rama currently exists belongs to the Hindus.
The majority 2-1 verdict running into nearly 8,000 pages had come after nearly 60 years of tortuous litigation over who holds the title to the disputed site.
Justices SU Khan, Sudhir Agarwal and DV Sharma had written separate judgments but the majority verdict held that the area covered by the central dome of the three-domed
structure where the idol of Lord Rama is presently situated belongs to Hindus.
Justices Khan and Agarwal had said the entire disputed land should be divided into three equal parts, each to be given to Sunni Waqf Board, Nirmohi Akhara and the parties
representing `Ram Lalla Virajman` (seated Baby Ram).
The majority judges had declared maintenance of status quo at the disputed land for three months.
More from India
More from World
More from Sports
More from Entertaiment
- Narsingh Yadav doping controversy: Who's to blame?
- Narsingh Yadav doping controversy: Who's to blame? - Part II
- NADA likely to declare verdict on wrestler Narsingh Yadav's doping case on Thursday
- DNA: Analysis of crime, fraud and corruption during election in POK
- DNA: Analysis of crime, fraud and corruption during election in POK - Part II
- Airtel proposes Rs 30 crore annual package to Sunil Mittal
- Chinese soldiers spotted in Uttarakhand's Chamoli; defence ministry says 'no incursion'
- US Presidential Elections: Donald Trump could win, warns Barack Obama
- Delhi Transport Minister says 17 auto unions end strike; union leader denies
- World at war over money, not religious faith, says Pope