India sides with US; votes against Iran in IAEA resolution
Zeenews
       English        
Saturday, February 11, 2012 
Search
Follwo us on: Facebook Follwo us on: Twiter RSS Mail to us Mail to us Mail to us
Nation

India sides with US; votes against Iran in IAEA resolution

Last Updated: Saturday, November 28, 2009, 00:10
Views 1502 Comments 2  
Tags: IndiaIAEA
India sides with US; votes against Iran in IAEA resolution London/Port of Spain: India on Friday joined the US, Russia, China and others at the IAEA in censuring Iran over its nuclear programme and asked the Islamic nation to stop uranium enrichment and allow international verification.

At the same time, India opposed any "renewed punitive" action on the basis of the latest resolution passed by the 35-member Board of Governors of the UN nuclear watchdog International Atomic Energy Agency(IAEA) against Iran in Austrian capital Vienna. It is for the third time in four years that India is voting for a resolution against Iran at the IAEA.

An External Affairs Ministry statement also underscored that the path of dialogue should not be given up.

25 countries voted in favour of the resolution spearheaded by the US. The resolution was endorsed by six major world powers--the US, Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany-- reflecting a rare measure of unity on Iran.

India voted in favour of the resolution contending that it could not ignore conclusions of IAEA Director General Mohammad El Baradei who has said that there has been "no movement on remaining issues of concern" which need to be clarified for the Agency to verify the exclusively peaceful nature of Iran’s nuclear programme.

The resolution demanded that Iran immediately suspend construction of its newly-revealed uranium enrichment plant at Qom--a site kept secret until recently.

The resolution ‘Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and Relevant Provisions of Security Council Resolutions in the Islamic Republic of Iran’ demanded that Iran immediately suspend construction of its newly-revealed uranium enrichment plant at Qom--a site kept secret until recently.

It asked Tehran to reveal the purpose of the plant and the chronology of its construction and wanted it to "confirm... that (it) has not taken a decision to construct, or authorise construction of, any other nuclear facility which has as yet not been declared to the agency."

Significantly, Russia and China, which had been opposing any resolution, also backed it.

Venezuela, Malaysia and Cuba voted against the resolution while six countries -- Afghanistan, Brazil, Egypt, Pakistan, South Africa and Turkey -- abstained. Azerbaijan was absent from the vote.

It is the first time since February 2006 that the IAEA board has passed a resolution against that country.

Decision taken at highest level

According to sources, India's decision to vote against Iran was taken at the highest level.

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, who is in Port of Spain to attend the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM), consulted Congress president Sonia Gandhi, Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee and External Affairs Minister SM Krishna on the issue.

An indication of India's stand at the IAEA was given by Singh during his just-concluded visit to the US where he reiterated the country's position that it does not support Iran's nuclear weapons ambitions.

"India has considered the role of the DG has having a vital bearing on the consideration of all issues by the Board of Governors. The conclusions he has drawn in his report are therefore difficult to ignore," the Ministry of External Affairs said.

MEA’s statement

India's explanation of Vote at the IAEA noted the DG concluded that Iran's failure to notify the Agency of the existence of new facility until September 2009, rather than soon after the decision to construct it or to authorise construction was taken, was inconsistent with its obligations under the Subsidiary.

Arrangements to its Safeguards Agreement and that Iran's late declaration of the new facility reduces confidence in the absence of other nuclear facilities under construction in Iran which have not been declared to the Agency.

"We do not believe that the adoption of this resolution should divert the parties away from dialogue. This resolution cannot be the basis of a renewed punitive approach or new sanctions," the MEA said in a statement.

"In fact, the coming weeks should be used by all concerned to expand the diplomatic space to satisfactorily address all outstanding issues," the MEA said, adding "India firmly supports keeping the door open for dialogue and avoidance of confrontation."

The MEA said India's "support for the resolution is based on the key points contained in the Report of the DG."

"During previous Board meetings, we had underlined the critical importance of continued cooperation and dialogue between the Agency and Iran. The Agency's safeguards system is the bedrock of the international community's confidence that peaceful uses of nuclear energy and non-proliferation objectives can be pursued in a balanced manner. The integrity of this system should be preserved," it said.

"In recent months we were encouraged by the new pathways of engagement that had opened up with Iran, including the recent meetings in Geneva and Vienna which gave rise to hopes of constructive and productive results," the Ministry said.

The MEA pointed out that India has consistently supported the right of all states to the peaceful uses of nuclear energy consistent with the respective obligations that they have undertaken.

"In Iran's case, which is a signatory to the NPT, it has all the rights and obligations that go with its membership of the NPT pertaining to the use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes," it said.

"We also underline the importance of the full and effective implementation of all safeguards obligations undertaken by member states of the IAEA," the MEA added.

India, while persistently favouring dialogue, has maintained that IAEA should be the nodal authority to decide on the issue.

Addressing the Council On Foreign Relations (CFR), a leading US think-tank, in Washington on Monday, Singh said, "As far as Iran's nuclear weapons ambitions are concerned I have stated it unambiguously on several occasions that we don't support nuclear ambitions of Iran."

While as a signatory to NPT (Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty) it has all the rights that flow from the NPT for the use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, it has obligations that go with its membership, he said in reply to a question.

"There is no ambiguity in our position and we are quite clear in our thinking that Iran should not go in for nuclear weapon or all that is inconsistent with obligations as member of NPT," he said.

The Prime Minister had also made it clear that India would abide any sanctions imposed by the Security Council on Iran, but indicated that he favoured the path of engagement with Iran.

PTI

First Published: Saturday, November 28, 2009, 00:10

Comments

ANOOPAM MODAK - DELHI
On one hand India is negotiating with Iran with the contemplation of bringing a gas pipeline through Pakistan to fulfill India`s energy needs, with Iran as the supplier, and on the other hand it connived with the western world to vote against Iran`s Nuclear Enrichment Programme in consonance with the resolution of the International Atomic Energy Agency. The western world led by America is out to attack Iran after its misadventure against Iraq.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
rishi - chennai
We r Sorry iran but an highly islamized country is simply not required in the current socio economic structure
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

View all Comments   

Post your Comments

Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Most liked Comments