Journalist beaten up by Delhi Shahi Imam`s supporters
Zeenews
       English        
Tuesday, May 29, 2012 
Search
Follwo us on: Facebook Follwo us on: Twiter RSS Mail to us Mail to us Mail to us
Delhi

Journalist beaten up by Delhi Shahi Imam's supporters

Last Updated: Thursday, October 14, 2010, 23:57
Comments 10  
Lucknow: Shahi Imam of the Delhi Jama Masjid, Maulana Syed Ahmed Bukhari on Thursday lost his cool when a Muslim journalist questioned him regarding the Ayodhya verdict during a press conference following which he was thrashed by supporters of the cleric.

Mohd Abdul Waheed Chisti, a reporter with a local Urdu daily, raised a question relating to the ownership of the disputed site before the construction of the Babri mosque in Ayodhya.

Chisti asked the Shahi Imam to spell out his stand on the mention of King Dashrath's name in land records of 1528 before the Babri mosque was constructed.

Initially, Bukhari skirted the question but when the journalist insisted, he was threatened.

"Get him out of this conference, Bukhari shouted while accusing the journalist of working against the interests of the Muslims.

Bukhari's supporters then thrashed the journalist in full public glare. People like him will "not be tolerated by Muslims at any cost," the Shahi Imam said before leaving the press conference.

Chisti said he was only seeking a clarification from Bukhari, who had needlessly got provoked.

The journalist later filed an FIR against Bukhari and his supporters at Hazratganj kotwali.

Earlier, Bukhari said the September 30 verdict of the Allahabad High Court on the Ayodhya title suits was based on faith and was not acceptable to the Muslims.

He said there was no question of evolving a consensus or even holding talks for giving the mosque site for temple construction.

The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court had directed that the 2.77-acre disputed site be divided into 3 parts. Of this, 2 parts go to the Hindus and the remaining to the Muslims.

On efforts by Hashim Ansari, the oldest litigant in the title suits, for an out of court settlement, Bukhari said he did not take him seriously as he was "changing his statements frequently."

PTI

First Published: Thursday, October 14, 2010, 23:57

Comments

P Kumar - Hyderabad, India
i don`t know if the islam religion has no place for respecting your nation and you can`t bow to the land which sustains your life. if muslims can`t take pride in being indian and saluting their motherland they don`t have any right to stay in india. goverment, please wake up you are doing lot of goody goody things to appease muslims for their vote against bjp. and now you can see true color of muslim religious leader, still you want to continue benefitting muslims whose integrity on nationalism has always doubtful then god bless our motherland india.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Fahad - Pakistan
Hello, I am from Pakistan and a regular reader of the Zee news. It helps me to get a better perspective of both nation`s point of views. The above mentioned incident is sad. No person is allowed to harass or thrash any other. In this regard, my greatest disappointment is that some of the bloggers have dragged Prophet Mohammad in their comments. I urge all my friends Hindu or Muslim to please avoid such comments as they can be hurtful. I also hope that zee news,which rightfully boasts of a good reputation will censor those comments that are hurtful to the people belonging to any religion ... Thank you
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
howard - india
@irfan, all the judges in the recent verdict have agreed that there existed a ram temple before it was demolished and the babri mosque was built. Do you want to say that you are more intelligent that those judges? and the Archaeological Society of India? I doubt that. There definitely existed a ram temple as it is the birth place of ram, you and your brothers will always live in their fantasy land. After the behavior of Imam, he should be put behind the bars and should be punished.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
ramesh - pune
Bukhari like person holding such position not believing in peace and justice only indicates intolerance and hatred teaching of islam spreading by persons like him and need to think over by peace loving persons.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
mohan - pune
Lord Ram temple was detroyed by one so called evader and terrorist, Babur. Am I right Irfan. Dont issue any certificate to the hindus. We are far better than you. Why you mum, recetly you destroyed only Jain temple in the vally. Then what you called. We never destroyed any mosques or relegion. it is in your blood. Not our blood. Only our right we are demading. Not your property. That means you accept Babur as a saint. But in my view he is terrorisst, not more than this. bande mataram
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Irfan - Sringar
The comments of users show the amount of hatred against Muslims. Zee news should not print / publish such comments which can flare up emotions. We don`t know weather a temple existed at the site or weather LORD RAM was born at the site but we certainly know that a mosque was destroyed at the site on 6th Dec which was a blot on the face of indian democracy. Cultured citizens must bow their heads in shame & apologize for the sad act. Regarding the ownership of the land let the court decide based on historical facts. Thanks
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Dinesh - USA
the way shahi imam abused the reporter and trashed him with anger is similar of `` osama `` to us and what agent he was asking about? pakistani agent? if indian agent, is shahi imam anti-indian? today, we likes to justify bal thackrey by keeping this idiot in control shabana azmi was right to say `` india should throw this guy in afghanistan by helicopter `` seems shahi imam`s policy:- belive me islam is the religion of peace, but if you don`t belive we would kill you
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Ashish S - Kolkata
This is what this community is all about.... They cannot withstand or answer questions if raised that may not be in the support of muslims
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
BRIJ - NEWYORK
THEY SHOW THEIR REAL COLOR,DEMOCRACY AND THESE MOULVI THEY CAN`T GET ALONG.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
K.Venugopal - Mumbai
Mohammad destroyed the idols in Kaaba because he believed the Kaaba originally did not have idols. The Karsevaks destroyed Babri structure because they believed originally a temple stood there. So if the Muslims condemn karsevaks for destroying the mosque, Hindus should also condemn Mohammad for destroying idols in Kaaba.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

View all Comments   

Post your Comments

Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Most liked Comments