Justice Ganguly for increasing retirement age of judges
  • This Section
  • Latest
  • Web Wrap
Last Updated: Wednesday, February 08, 2012, 12:39
New Delhi: Justice AK Ganguly, who retired as Supreme Court judge after delivering the 2G verdict, feels there is a strong case for increasing the age of superannuation of apex court judges, saying the 65 year age limit has been "unreasonably fixed".

"A judge is not a football player, i.e. physical prowess is not a prime requisite (to be a judge)," said Ganguly expressing his views on superannuation of apex court judges.

He said "the position of a judge is one of maturity and wisdom" and the retirement age of a judge should be "much more flexible" as "before he gets to know the scheme of things" he has to demit office.

Justice Ganguly, who was part of the bench which cancelled the 122 licences for 2G spectrum, said the tenure of the judge in the Supreme Court is "rather short" which is not the case in major democratic countries in the world.

"While I say this for the Supreme Court judge, the same should be true about high court judges also. The position of a judge is one of maturity and wisdom. It is accepted universally that with age the level of maturity and wisdom reached. A judge is not a football player. That is physical prowess is not a prime requisite," he said in an interview.

Asked whether there should be an upper age limit of retirement for an apex court judge, he said, "I am not suggesting that. But retirement age of a judge should be much more flexible".

Considering the increased longevity of human beings in recent years, 65 years for a Supreme Court judge and 62 years for a High Court judge to retire "in my opinion has been unreasonably fixed".

Asked what he thought could be the retirement age for judges, Justice Ganguly said it is for the authorities concerned to do the research and come to opinion.


First Published: Wednesday, February 08, 2012, 11:33

comments powered by Disqus