Mandatory death penalty is unconstitutional: SC
New Delhi: The Supreme Court has ruled that
mandatory death penalty for an offender under the Arms Act was
unconstitutional as it violated fundamental rights guaranteed
to a citizen.
A bench of Justices Asok Kumar Ganguly (since retd) and J
S Khehar said Section 27(3) of the Arms Act, which imposed
mandatory death penalty, was also "ultra vires and void" as it
restricts the powers of the court in awarding sentences to an
accused in such cases.
"A law which is not consistent with notions of fairness
while it imposes an irreversible penalty like death penalty is
repugnant to the concept of right and reason," the bench said.
"All these concepts of `due process` and the concept of a
just, fair and reasonable law has been read by this court into
the guarantee under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.
"Therefore, the provision of Section 27(3) of the Act is
violative of Article 14 (equality before law) and 21 (liberty)
of the Constitution," Justice Ganguly, writing the judgement,
The apex court passed the appeal while dismissing a
Punjab government appeal challenging the acquittal of Dalbir
Singh, a CRPF constable charged with indiscriminately firing
at his superiors with a rifle over a service row in 1993.
He was charged with murder (Section 302IPC) and various
offences under the Arms Act.
Section 27(3) mandates that "whoever uses any prohibited
arms or prohibited ammunition or acts in contravention of
Section 7 and if such use or act results in the death of any
other person then that person guilty of such use or acting in
contravention of Section 7 shall be punishable with death."
The apex court while upholding the acquittal of Singh
said even if any act done in contravention of Section 7,
namely, acquisition or possession, or manufacture or sale,
of prohibited arms results in death of any person, the person
in contravention of Section 7 shall be punished with death.
"This is thus a very drastic provision for many reasons.
Apart from the fact that this imposes a mandatory death
penalty the section is so widely worded to the extent that if
as a result of any accidental or unintentional use or any
accident arising out of any act in contravention of Section 7,
death results, the only punishment, which has to be
mandatorily imposed on the person in contravention is, death,"
the bench said.
The apex court said the proviso was violative of Article
13(2) which says, "The State shall not make any law which
takes away or abridges the rights conferred by this part and
any law made in contravention of this clause shall, to the
extent of the contravention, be void."
"This Court declares that Section 27(3) of Arms Act, 1959
is ultra vires of the Constitution and is declared void.
"Section 27(3) of the Act also deprives the judiciary
from discharging its Constitutional duties of judicial review
whereby it has the power of using discretion in the sentencing
procedure," the bench said.
More from India
More from World
More from Sports
More from Entertaiment
- Revealed - How Indian Army hit terror camps across LoC!
- Pak forces will teach Zee News what real surgical strike is: Hafiz Saeed
- India used 'Cartosat 2c' satellite in surgical strikes against Pakistan
- Panel discussion on Hafiz Saeed's reaction after Indian Army surgical strikes
- DNA: Inside story of Indian Army's surgical strikes across LoC
- Hafiz Saeed threatens Zee News, says Pak forces will teach what real surgical strikes are
- Pak postpones SAARC Summit after five member states pull out of conference: As it happened
- After threatening Zee News, Hafiz Saeed says PM Modi, Ajit Doval staged `surgical strike drama'
- Who is Chandu Babulal Chauhan and why India wants to bring him back from Pakistan - Read