No confrontation with govt: Gen Singh on age row
Zeenews
       English        
Tuesday, May 29, 2012 
Search
Follwo us on: Facebook Follwo us on: Twiter RSS Mail to us Mail to us Mail to us
Nation

No confrontation with govt: Gen Singh on age row

Last Updated: Thursday, January 05, 2012, 10:05
Comments 6  
Zeenews Bureau

New Delhi: Amid a media hyperbole over the issue, Army Chief General VK Singh has chosen to play down the controversy surrounding his date of birth by denying any confrontation with the government.

As per a newspaper report, Thursday, Singh said that he is committed to work for the organisation and that he has not yet thought of moving court over the matter.

The dispute over Gen Singh’s age has arisen as he has two dates of birth — May 10, 1950 and May 10, 1951 — mentioned at various places in his official records.

The biggest implication is that the year of birth will determine when the Army chief will retire. According to the defence ministry’s stand, this would be in 2012. If it had accepted Gen Singh’s claim, his tenure would have stretched to 2013.

“There is no rift, there is no confrontation. I have always felt that the government has appointed you and you will work for the organisation. Where is the row involved in this?” Gen Singh was quoted as saying by the newspaper.

Importantly, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has said to have backed the Defence Minister AK Antony’s tand on the issue. After a meeting between the two, yesterday, the cabinet committee on security (CCS) discussed threadbare and decided to back the defence ministry’s stand.

The age row which had been brewing for a while came to boil last week after defence ministry, armed with legal opinion from the attorney general rejected Gen Singh’s statutory complaint to settle the dispute over his age.

Gen Singh later wrote to the defence minister and maintained that it is the question of his “honour and dignity”.

The whole issue turned political after former Punjab chief minister and state Congress president Captain (retd.) Amarinder Singh has batted for Gen Singh and said that he backed the Army Chief's fight for his honour and for upholding his integrity and that the controversy was affecting the morale of the 1.13-million strong Army.

First Published: Thursday, January 05, 2012, 10:05

Comments

poornima - visakhaptnam
pls tell when i will get govt job
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Rajender Kumar Bhardwaj - New Delhi
While getting job in the Army or a govt job. The appointment is given based on age, education, physical fitness and character based. Age is counted based on date of birth certificate and matriculation certificate. It is not understood why the govt not accepted Geb VK Singh date of birth reflected in birth certificate as well as on matriculation certificate. It is totally wrong and gives wrong message to serving/retired army officers and soldeirs. Govt should tackle as per law.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Karan Kharb - Noida
The simple issue of a clerical error has been allowed, thanks to our red tape bound mandarins, to fester into such an embarrassment to the Government. The COAS is fighting on pure merits of the case seeking merely rectification of an error. And he has been fighting for resovling this since long. Why is the bureaucratic brinkmanship vitiating the path of natural justice? Just because the rectification at this stage will alter the chartered path of certain generals in the succession line should be no reason to deny justice to Gen VK Singh - a man of proven credentials and unimpeachable integrity.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
RAKESH KAPUR - A M R I T S A R
IT IS A WELCOME STATEMENT FROM THE GENERAL, HOWEVER THE GOVERMENT SHOULD ADDRESS HIS CONCERNS OVER THE AGE ROW(WHICH IS NOT HIS FAULT) AND GIVE HIM SOME IMPORTANT ASSIGNMENT AFTER RETIREMENT.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Harpal Singh - Chhattisgarh
If GENERAL VK want to give something to Indian Army, he must fight this issue.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Major Prakash Patil - Jaysingpur
The general`s position is not only right but ethical too. Man`s honour is the most valuable thing. If honour is lost, evrything is lost. By accepting attorny general`s viewpoint, General stands in a poor light. He lied for gaining a year of additional service. It is against the highest standards which army officer is expected to maintain. Fighting to restore the honour need not be misconstrued as the confrontation with Govt.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

View all Comments   

Post your Comments

Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Most liked Comments

Major Prakash Patil - Jaysingpur
The general`s position is not only right but ethical too. Man`s honour is the most valuable thing. If honour is lost, evrything is lost. By accepting attorny general`s viewpoint, General stands in a poor light. He lied for gaining a year of additional service. It is against the highest standards which army officer is expected to maintain. Fighting to restore the honour need not be misconstrued as the confrontation with Govt.



Harpal Singh - Chhattisgarh
If GENERAL VK want to give something to Indian Army, he must fight this issue.