No forward movement in talks: Dalai Lama envoys
Zeenews
       English        
Saturday, February 11, 2012 
Search
Follwo us on: Facebook Follwo us on: Twiter RSS Mail to us Mail to us Mail to us
Nation

No forward movement in talks: Dalai Lama envoys

Last Updated: Tuesday, February 02, 2010, 22:28
Views 661 Comments 0  
Dharamsala: Talks between Tibetan leaders and Chinese officials on the vexed Tibetan issue failed to bear any result, special envoys of the Dalai Lama on Tuesday said.

"There was no forward movement during the talks with China," Kelsang Gyaltsen told reporters here.

Special representatives Lodi G Gyari and Gyaltsen, accompanied by senior assistants Tenzin P Atisha, Bhuchung K Tsering, both members of Tibetan Task Force on negotiations and Jigmey Passang from the secretariat of the Tibetan task force, held the ninth round of talks with Chinese officials in Beijing recently.

The ninth round was held after a gap of 15 months. The eight round was held in November 2008 before the Beijing Olympics.

According to Gyari, the Chinese authorities have asked Tibetans not to indulge in anti-China activities.

"Tibetans should not indulge in activities which harm the aspirations of the Chinese people and China's relations with other countries," Gyari quoted the Chinese officials as saying.

The eight round of talks came to a standstill after a memorandum on genuine autonomy for Tibetan people submitted by the Tibetan side met with derision by the Chinese side which called it a demand for "half independence, disguised independence or covert independence".

Failure of the talks forced the Tibetan temporal head to call a special meeting of friends of Tibet from world over in Delhi last year to discuss future course of action. Recently US President Barack Obama had said he would ask China to resume dialogue with the Tibetans to find solution to the problem.

PTI

First Published: Tuesday, February 02, 2010, 22:28

Comments


View all Comments   

Post your Comments

Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Most liked Comments