`Pak should make Headly approver in 26/11 case`
Zeenews
       English        
 Follow Me on Pinterest Google Plus Ditto RSS Mail to us Mail to us
Friday, May 24, 2013 
Search
Nation

'Pak should make Headly approver in 26/11 case'

Last Updated: Friday, August 06, 2010, 19:25     A- A A+
Comments 1
Mumbai: Pakistan should adduce evidence of terror convict David Headley by making him an approver in the 26/11 attacks case instead of asking India to send Mumbai magistrate R V Sawant Waghule to testify in a court there, special public prosecutor Ujjwal Nikam said on Friday.

"If Pakistan is really interested in punishing the perpetrators of the 26/11 attacks, why have they not considered adducing evidence of Headley as an approver through video conference," asked Nikam, who conducted the 26/11 trial in a special court here.

Asked about his reaction to Pakistan's request to India on examining evidence of magistrate Sawant Waghule, who had recorded the confession of lone captured terrorist Ajmal Kasab, Nikam said it was prerogative of the government to consider this.

"But if Pakistan's investigating agency wants to make Kasab as a wanted accused, then was it necessary for them to implead Headley as one of the wanted accused since he was a conspirator of 26/11 terror attacks," Nikam told PTI.

According to the provisions of Pakistani criminal code, they can turn Headley into approver and adduce his evidence through video link not only against the perpetrators of crime but also against those who had actively assisted in facilitating 26/11 terror acts and who are still at large, Nikam said.

One of the conditions imposed by a US court in the plea bargain of Headley was that he can give evidence in Pakistan also and therefore his evidence can be recorded through video link, Nikam said.

"Headley's evidence would expose the gravity of the 26/11 conspiracy and Pakistan should evince keen interest in leading his evidence if they wanted to fight against terror."

Kasab has already given a judicial confession in the trial court here in accordance with Indian Evidence Act implicating himself and co-accused in Pakistan. His confession can be used against co-accused as well, Nikam said.

However, Kasab's trial is over and the question of trying him in Pakistan is improbable because according to Pakistan law it would be marred by double jeopardy, he said.

"Therefore to ask for examination of the Mumbai magistrate in a Pakistan court for proving confession of Kasab is just beyond my imagination," Nikam said.

Both, Waghule and Investigating Officer Ramesh Mahale were already examined in the trial court here and their evidence was forwarded to Pakistan, Nikam said and wondered what purpose it would serve to examine them again in a Pakistan court.

PTI

For Zee News’s Updates, follow us on Twitter , Facebook, Google+, Pinterest

First Published: Friday, August 06, 2010, 19:25

Post your Comments

Name:
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Comments

BRIJ - NEWYORK
this case is like any other you will get nothing out of it, why because you have no guts you are impotant.otherwise you will take action when parliament was attacked,you again have legal rights when mumbai was attacked. this is your failure to take action resulted the response you are getting from pak,and current situation in kashmir.indian govt always acted like this is not their country they simply work there like daily labourers accountable to nothing just collect the wages end of the day.any one with bit pride in country will demolish the enemy or die to prove they are worth calling citizen of the land they live or rule, but is nothing like that in india.they are used to get abuse from from everybody because their corrupted sold out govt,who has no values.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

View all Comments   

Most liked Comments

Top News



latest

South Asia

US, Pak should acknowledge each other`s roles: Sherry Rehman


Read More »