Religious structures on govt land; SC asks states, UTs to reply

Last Updated: Friday, July 5, 2013 - 16:12

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday asked all states and Union Territories to give within six weeks details about the number of religious structures on encroached government land that have been razed or relocated by them and those that are still standing.

The court also asked them to issue notifications for putting in place "policy/rules" for removal or relocation of illegal religious structures built on public land and sought action against officials who allow such constructions in future.

"Each state should give details as to how many illegal religious structures have been removed as on June 30, 2013 and how many are left. They should also state the steps taken for removing or relocating them. The affidavit shall be filed within six weeks from today," a bench of justices RM Lodha and SJ Mukhopadhaya said.

The bench also asked the states to give a copy of their affidavit to the Centre for preparation of a consolidated national data as to how many illegal structures have been demolished or relocated and how many of them are still existing.

During the hearing, the court, which posted the matter on August 30, said the officials who will now allow such structures to come up in their areas should be punished.

Earlier this year, the bench had asked all the state governments to remove unauthorised constructions including places of worships from roads and public places.

It had also restrained the states from granting permission for erecting statues or construction of any structure at public places which obstructs traffic movement, saying that citizens have the right to move freely and it cannot be taken away.


Download the all new Zee News app for Android and iOS to stay up to date with latest headlines and news stories in Politics, Entertainment, Sports, Technology, Business and much more from India and around the world.

First Published: Friday, July 5, 2013 - 16:12

More from zeenews

comments powered by Disqus