Ruchika case: HC questions Rathore`s promotion
The Punjab and Haryana High Court Tuesday questioned as to how SPS Rathore was promoted to the top rank of DGP despite the Ruchika Girhotra molestation case pending against him.
Chandigarh: The Punjab and Haryana High Court Tuesday questioned as to how SPS Rathore was promoted to the top
rank of DGP despite the Ruchika Girhotra molestation case
pending against him.
A division bench comprising Chief Justice Mukul Mudgal and
Ranjan Gogoi while seeking details from the Haryana government
in this regard fixed January 28 as the next date of hearing.
Meanwhile, the CBI submitted that it will also place on
record its final report in the FIRs in the three fresh cases
filed against the disgraced former top cop on January 28.
The court direction came during hearing of a PIL filed
by a local advocate seeking a fresh case against Rathore for
abetment to suicide of Ruchika, a 14-year-old budding tennis
player, in 1993.
After spending close to six months behind bars,
68-year-old Rathore, who was sentenced to 18-months in jail in
the Ruchika molestation case, was released from prison after
the Supreme Court granted him bail on November 11.
Ruchika was molested on August 12,1990.
On the promotion issue, the bench observed how Rathore
was promoted despite a criminal case pending against him.
The court also directed the Haryana government to place
on record in form of an affidavit its promotion policy with
regard to officers facing criminal charges.
The government told the court that it would file its
details on promotion policy on the next date of hearing,
especially in connection with Rathore.
The CBI had recently filed two closure reports in the
Special CBI Court in Ambala in two of the three fresh cases
registered against the former Haryana DGP.
The first two cases against Rathore are related to
doctoring of Ruchika`s postmortem report and custodial
torture of her brother Ashu. Probe is still on in the case on
abatement to suicide charge against him.
The lawyer had filed the PIL in December last year
seeking a fresh case against Rathore under section 305 of the
IPC (abetment of suicide of a minor or insane person) as
Ruchika was a minor when the incident occurred. A person
convicted under section 305 IPC could face death penalty or
The PIL also sought appropriate action against all those
officers who allegedly favoured Rathore and helped in delaying
the proceedings against him for almost two decades.
A sessions court had on May 25 this year increased
Rathore`s jail term from six months to one-and-half years
while allowing CBI and Ruchika`s family`s appeal for
enhancement of the punishment.