SC questions Centre on probe against ex-CJI
Zeenews
       English        
Tuesday, May 29, 2012 
Search
Follwo us on: Facebook Follwo us on: Twiter RSS Mail to us Mail to us Mail to us
Nation

SC questions Centre on probe against ex-CJI

Last Updated: Monday, February 13, 2012, 12:33
Comments 3  
SC questions Centre on probe against ex-CJI New Delhi: The Supreme Court today asked the Centre to brief it on whether it has conducted any inquiry on allegation against ex-Chief Justice of India and NHRC chief K G Balakrishnan of amassing assets disproportionate to his income.

A bench headed by Chief Justice S H Kapadia directed the government to respond within a month on action taken by it or intended to be taken on the allegation that the former CJI amassed properties worth of Rs 40 crore in his relatives names between 2004 to 2009.

"We want to know what was done on the representation (before the government against ex-CJI) and what government intends to do," the bench said when it was pointed out that representation to the government was made ten months back but no action had been taken on it so far.

The bench asked Attorney General G E Vahanvati to appraise it on the issue within a month.

Vahanvati assured the court that he will go through the petition and will write to all government authorities concerned.

The court was hearing a PIL filed by NGO Common Cause seeking directions to the government to conduct probe against the former CJI for allegedly amassing disproportionate assets.

Justice Balakrishnan was elevated as a Supreme Court judge on June 2000 and was appointed Chief Justice of India on January 14, 2007. He retired on May 12, 2010 after which he was appointed NHRC Chairman.

The NGO has sought issuance of direction to the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) for making a reference to the apex court under the Human Rights Act to look into the allegations of "misbehaviour" against Justice Balakrishnan.

"Despite the fact that there is overwhelming evidence indicating that the Respondent No 3 (Balakrishnan) has been guilty of several acts of grave misbehaviour, the government has not taken any step for his removal from the NHRC," the petition, filed through lawyer Prashant Bhushan, said.

A provision under the Human Rights Act says that the Chairperson or other member of NHRC "shall be removed from his office by the order of the President of India on the ground of misbehaviour after the Supreme Court, on a reference being made to it by the President, has on inquiry reported that the Chairperson or such member, on any such ground, be removed."

The NGO, in the petition, has annexed media reports as documents to buttress its allegations that 'benami' properties were acquired by kith and kin of Balakrishnan during his tenure in the Supreme Court.

PTI

First Published: Monday, February 13, 2012, 11:40

Comments

rupendra rakshit - yamunanagar
Why has this situation arisen that the CJI has to ask the govt. to reply. This clearly shows govt. attitude of protecting the corrupt. What to talk of taking action the govt. has put him in a post of chairman to give him further benefits. The supreme court should order an inquiry to find out the interest of individual or govt. to make him the chaiman of NHRC.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
MADHU - KOTTAYAM
DONOT PROTECT CRIMINALS AND CORRUPT.IF JUSTICE KAPADIA HIMSELF FEELS HE HAD GAINED PROFIT WORTH RUPEEONE ABOVE HIS SALARY DURING ANY DAY OF HIS CAREER IN THE PAST HE CANNOT SIT IN THE CHAIR. AND JUDGE.A CORRUPT SHALLNOT JUDGE A CORRUPT,BOTH SHOULD COME STEP DOWN.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
D.N.MAKHIJA - DELHI...........INDIA
NO VIP IS PUNISHED IN OUR COUNTRY.......................
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

View all Comments   

Post your Comments

Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Most liked Comments

MADHU - KOTTAYAM
DONOT PROTECT CRIMINALS AND CORRUPT.IF JUSTICE KAPADIA HIMSELF FEELS HE HAD GAINED PROFIT WORTH RUPEEONE ABOVE HIS SALARY DURING ANY DAY OF HIS CAREER IN THE PAST HE CANNOT SIT IN THE CHAIR. AND JUDGE.A CORRUPT SHALLNOT JUDGE A CORRUPT,BOTH SHOULD COME STEP DOWN.